Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863400›Full record

ReviewCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2020

Dr Abdulrahman E Koshak, Prof Emad A Koshak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Food science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Potential Pharmacological Applications ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Natural Products as a Potential Source of Promising Therapeutics for COVID-19 and Viral Diseases.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Review
  11. Nigelladine A among Selected Compounds fromInternational journal of clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Immunology and controlling of coronaviruses; the current enemy for humanity: A review.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2021
    Review
  18. Black Cumin (Nutrients · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dr Abdulrahman E KoshakDepartment of Natural Products & Alternative Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Prof Emad A KoshakDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronaviruses are responsible for several human diseases, such as the infectious novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

objectiveTo explore the studies supporting the

methodsA literature search for published or preprint in silico studies between 1990 and 2020 in electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar) was performed for the terms Nigella sativa,

resultsAt least 8 in silico studies have shown that some compounds of

conclusionsThese preliminary data of in silico studies propose

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19in silicoNigella sativaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32863400
PMCPMC7445151
OpenAlexW3080972722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.