ArticleTrends in cancer2020
Tele-oncology in the COVID-19 Era: Are Medical Students Left Behind?
Article in Trends in cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating digital health competencies in community-engaged medical education: A scoping review for developing teaching and learning strategies for digital health.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Strengthening E-learning strategies for active learning in crisis situations: a mixed-method study in the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Undergraduate medical teaching with remote consultations in general practice: a realist evaluation.BJGP open · 2022Article
- Cancer and COVID-19: ethical issues concerning the use of telemedicine during the pandemic.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Telemedicine and the current opportunities for the management of oncological patients in Peru in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.Critical reviews in oncology/hematology · 2021Review
- Response to Letter by Rallis and Tejerina.Trends in cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.