Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32863048›Full record

ArticleSeminars in perinatology2020

Obstetric simulation for a pandemic.

Allison Eubanks, Brook Thomson, Emily Marko, Tamika Auguste, Logan Peterson, Dena Goffman, Shad Deering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seminars in perinatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allison EubanksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 104 Wood Rd, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brook ThomsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Children's Hospital of San Antonio, 333 N Santa Rosa St, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Emily MarkoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fairfax INOVA Hospital, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Tamika AugusteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Logan PetersonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 104 Wood Rd, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Dena GoffmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY, USA.
Shad DeeringDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, CHRISTUS Health, San Antonio, TX, USA. Electronic address: Shad.deering@christushealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines and recommendations are rapidly evolving. Providers strive to provide safe high-quality care for their patients in the already high-risk specialty of Obstetrics while also considering the risk that this virus adds to their patients and themselves. From other pandemics, evidence exists that simulation is the most effective way to prepare teams, build understanding and confidence, and increase patient and provider safety. FINDING: Practicing in-situ multidisciplinary simulations in the hospital setting has illustrated key opportunities for improvement that should be considered when caring for a patient with possible COVID-19.

conclusionIn the current COVID-19 pandemic, simulating obstetrical patient care from presentation to the hospital triage through postpartum care can prepare teams for even the most complicated patients while increasing their ability to protect themselves and their patients.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2COVID-19Delivery, ObstetricEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansObstetricsPandemicsPatient Care TeamPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSimulation TrainingCOVID-19obstetricssimulation

Identifiers

PMID32863048
PMCPMC7376342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.