Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862827›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

The genetic basis of diurnal preference in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mirko Pegoraro, Laura M M Flavell, Pamela Menegazzi, Perrine Colombi, Pauline Dao, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster, Eran Tauber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mirko PegoraroDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Laura M M FlavellDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Pamela MenegazziNeurobiology and Genetics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Perrine ColombiDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Pauline DaoDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Charlotte Helfrich-FörsterNeurobiology and Genetics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Eran TauberDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. etauber@univ.haifa.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-6535

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G02085X/1Israel Science Foundation 1737/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost animals restrict their activity to a specific part of the day, being diurnal, nocturnal or crepuscular. The genetic basis underlying diurnal preference is largely unknown. Under laboratory conditions, Drosophila melanogaster is crepuscular, showing a bi-modal activity profile. However, a survey of strains derived from wild populations indicated that high variability among individuals exists, including flies that are nocturnal.

resultsUsing a highly diverse population, we performed an artificial selection experiment, selecting flies with extreme diurnal or nocturnal preference. After 10 generations, we obtained highly diurnal and nocturnal strains. We used whole-genome expression analysis to identify differentially expressed genes in diurnal, nocturnal and crepuscular (control) flies. Other than one circadian clock gene (pdp1), most differentially expressed genes were associated with either clock output (pdf, to) or input (Rh3, Rh2, msn). This finding was congruent with behavioural experiments indicating that both light masking and the circadian pacemaker are involved in driving nocturnality.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that genetic variation segregating in wild populations contributes to substantial variation in diurnal preference. We identified candidate genes associated with diurnality/nocturnality, while data emerging from our expression analysis and behavioural experiments suggest that both clock and clock-independent pathways are involved in shaping diurnal preference. The diurnal and nocturnal selection strains provide us with a unique opportunity to understand the genetic architecture of diurnal preference.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsCircadian RhythmMotor ActivityCircadian clockDiurnal preferenceDrosophilaNocturnality

Identifiers

PMID32862827
PMCPMC7457780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.