Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862808›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Vertical structure in chlorophyll profiles: influence on primary production in the Arctic Ocean.

Heather A Bouman, Thomas Jackson, Shubha Sathyendranath, Trevor Platt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nitrate supply and uptake in the Atlantic Arctic sea ice zone: seasonal cycle, mechanisms and drivers.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Bio-optical evidence for increasingPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. The changing Arctic Ocean: consequences for biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A BoumanDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK.
Thomas JacksonPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Remote Sensing Unit, Plymouth, UK.
Shubha SathyendranathPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Remote Sensing Unit, Plymouth, UK.
Trevor PlattPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Remote Sensing Unit, Plymouth, UK.
Plymouth Marine Laboratory · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subsurface chlorophyll maximum (SCM) layers are prevalent throughout the Arctic Ocean under stratified conditions and are observed both in the wake of retreating sea ice and in thermally stratified waters. The importance of these layers on the overall productivity of Arctic pelagic ecosystems has been a source of debate. In this study, we consider the three principal factors that govern productivity within SCMs: the shape of the chlorophyll profile, the photophysiological characteristics of phytoplankton and the availability of light in the layer. Using the information on the biological and optical parameters describing the vertical structure of chlorophyll, phytoplankton absorption and photosynthesis-irradiance response curves, a spectrally resolved model of primary production is used to identify the set of conditions under which SCMs are important contributors to water-column productivity. Sensitivity analysis revealed systematic errors in the estimation of primary production when the vertical distribution of chlorophyll was not taken into account, with estimates of water-column production using a non-uniform profile being up to 97% higher than those computed using a uniform one. The relative errors were shown to be functions of the parameters describing the shape of the biomass profile and the light available at the SCM to support photosynthesis. Given that SCM productivity is believed to be largely supported by new nutrients, it is likely that the relative contribution of SCMs to new production would be significantly higher than that to gross primary production. We discuss the biogeochemical and ecological implications of these findings and the potential role of new ocean sensors and autonomous underwater vehicles in furthering the study of SCMs in such highly heterogeneous and remote marine ecosystems. This article is part of the theme issue 'The changing Arctic Ocean: consequences for biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning'.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArctic RegionsAtlantic OceanBiomassChlorophyllEcosystemIce CoverModels, BiologicalNormal DistributionPhotosynthesisPhytoplanktonSeawaterChlorophyllArctic Oceanprimary productionsubsurface chlorophyll maximum

Identifiers

PMID32862808
PMCPMC7481674
OpenAlexW3081940797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.