Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862767›Full record

SynthesisPerfusion2021

Anti-Xa versus time-guided anticoagulation strategies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ariane Willems, Peter P Roeleveld, Sonia Labarinas, John W Cyrus, Jennifer A Muszynski, Marianne E Nellis, Oliver Karam

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Perfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Between a rock and a hard place: anticoagulation management for ECMO.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Coagulation and Transfusion Updates From 2021.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariane WillemsPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1303-5942
Peter P RoeleveldPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sonia LabarinasDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
John W CyrusTompkins-McCaw Library for the Health Sciences, VCU Libraries, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jennifer A MuszynskiDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Marianne E NellisPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, NY Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Oliver KaramDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA, USA.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USChildren's Hospital of Richmond at VCU · USCornell University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to compare time-based vs anti-Xa-based anticoagulation strategies in patients on ECMO. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using multiple electronic databases and included studies from inception to July 19, 2019. The proportion of bleeding, thrombosis, and mortality were evaluated.Twenty-six studies (2,086 patients) were included. Bleeding occurred in 34.2% (95%CI 25.1;43.9) of the patients with anti-Xa-based versus 41.6% (95%CI 24.9;59.4) of the patients with time-based anticoagulation strategies. Thrombosis occurred in 32.6% (95%CI 19.1;47.7) of the patients with anti-Xa-based versus 38.4% (95%CI 22.2;56.1) of the patients with time-based anticoagulation strategies. And mortality rate was 35.4% (95%CI 28.9;42.1) of the patients with anti-Xa-based versus 42.9% (95%CI 36.9;48.9) of the patients with time-based anticoagulation strategies. Among the seven studies providing results from both anticoagulation strategies, significantly fewer bleeding events occurred in the anti-Xa-based anticoagulation strategy (adjusted OR 0.49 (95%CI 0.32;0.74),

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationHemorrhageHeparinHumansRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsHeparinACTanticoagulationanti-XaaPTTbleedingExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationmortalitythromboelastometrythrombosis

Identifiers

PMID32862767
PMCPMC8216320
OpenAlexW3082822976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.