Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862764›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Cancer Mortality in Trials of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Giacomo Tini, Edoardo Bertero, Alessio Signori, Maria Pia Sormani, Christoph Maack, Rudolf A De Boer, Marco Canepa, Pietro Ameri

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Giacomo TiniCardiovascular Disease Unit IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoIRCCS Italian Cardiovascular Network Genova Italy.
Edoardo BerteroComprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC) University Clinic Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Biostatistics University of Genova Italy.
Maria Pia SormaniDepartment of Health Sciences Section of Biostatistics University of Genova Italy.
Christoph MaackComprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC) University Clinic Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Rudolf A De BoerDepartment of Cardiology University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Marco CanepaCardiovascular Disease Unit IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoIRCCS Italian Cardiovascular Network Genova Italy.
Pietro AmeriCardiovascular Disease Unit IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoIRCCS Italian Cardiovascular Network Genova Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITComprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken · DEUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The burden of cancer in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is apparently growing. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may help understanding this observation, since they span decades of heart failure treatment. Methods and Results We assessed cancer, cardiovascular, and total mortality in phase 3 heart failure RCTs involving ≥90% individuals with left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, who were not acutely decompensated and did not represent specific patient subsets. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of each type of death for the control and treatment arms were calculated using a random-effects model. Temporal trends and the impact of patient and RCT characteristics on mortality outcomes were evaluated by meta-regression analysis. Cancer mortality was reported for 15 (25%) of 61 RCTs, including 33 709 subjects, and accounted for 6% to 14% of all deaths and 17% to 67% of noncardiovascular deaths. Cancer mortality rate was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.71) per 100 patient-years without temporal trend (

Indexed as

Heart FailureHumansNeoplasmsStroke Volumecancercomorbiditiesheart failuremortality

Identifiers

PMID32862764
PMCPMC7726990
OpenAlexW3081654420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.