Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862668›Full record

ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Drug-Drug Interactions of 257 Antineoplastic and Supportive Care Agents With 7 Anticoagulants: A Comprehensive Review of Interactions and Mechanisms.

Érique José F Peixoto de Miranda, Thamy Takahashi, Felipe Iwamoto, Suzete Yamashiro, Eliana Samano, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli Macedo, Eduardo Ramacciotti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hemostasis at the edge between physiology and cancer.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Emerging Insights of Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Érique José F Peixoto de MirandaCardiology, Medical Affairs, Bayer Brasil SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Thamy TakahashiMedical Information, Medical Affairs, Bayer Brasil SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe IwamotoMedical Information, Medical Affairs, Bayer Brasil SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Suzete YamashiroMedical Information, Medical Affairs, Bayer Brasil SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eliana SamanoCardiology, Medical Affairs, Bayer Brasil SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli MacedoCardio-Oncology Outpatient Clinic of Santa Casa de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-8488
Eduardo RamacciottiVascular Surgery, Hospital e Maternidade Dr. Christovão da Gama, Santo André, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-1333
Loyola University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on drug-drug interactions (DDI) of antineoplastic drugs with anticoagulants is scarce. We aim to evaluate factors associated with DDI of antineoplastic and supportive care drugs with anticoagulants resulting in modification of pharmacokinetics of these last mentioned. A literature review on DDI databases and summaries of products characteristics (SmPC) was done. Drug-drug interactions of 257 antineoplastic and supportive care drugs with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), warfarin, enoxaparin, or fondaparinux were categorized as no clinically significant expected DDI, potentially weak DDI, potentially clinically significant DDI, and recommendation against coadministration. Logistic regression models were performed to analyze the association between the dependent variable potentially clinically significant interaction/recommendation against coadministration and the mechanisms of DDI. Of the 1799 associations, 84.4% were absence of DDI, 3.6% potentially weak DDI, 10.2% potentially clinically relevant DDI, and 2.0% recommendation against coadministration. Warfarin has higher DDI potential than other anticoagulants. Enoxaparin and fondaparinux have fewer DDI than others. There was no difference between DOACs. Drug-drug interactions with apixaban and rivaroxaban was independently associated with the absence of CYP3A4 competition, P-glycoprotein inhibition, CYP3A4 induction, and drug class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Drug-drug interactions with dabigatran and edoxaban was associated with inhibition of P-glycoprotein and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Warfarin, induction of CYP3A4, and inhibition of CYP2C9. Enoxaparin and fondaparinux, only tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Direct oral anticoagulants did not differ regarding DDI with antineoplastic agents. Warfarin presented more DDI than other anticoagulants. P-glycoprotein inhibition and CYP3A4 induction were independently associated with DDI of antineoplastic agents with DOACs.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug InteractionsHumansAnticoagulantsAntineoplastic Agentsanticoagulantsantineoplastic agentsDOACsdrug–drug interactionssupportive care drugs

Identifiers

PMID32862668
PMCPMC7466894
OpenAlexW3081947540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.