Trial reportCirculation2020
Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With a History of Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.
Trial report in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01471522 (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of baseline risk of death or hospitalization on effectiveness of revascularization in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction-a prespecified analysis of REVIVED-BCIS2.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Trial
- Hyperaemic effects of adenosine and dobutamine in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a quantitative perfusion CMR study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Implications of Potential Undiagnosed HFpEF on Symptomatic Response With Coronary Revascularization.JACC. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Optimizing protected PCI strategies in the setting of chronic kidney disease and advanced coronary artery disease: a clinical case-based discussion.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- State-of-the-art management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: integrating diagnostic pathways, revascularization strategies, and guideline-directed therapy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Percutaneous coronary intervention or conservative therapy for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs)? Evidence from the ISCHEMIA trial.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- The impact of heart failure and bleeding risk on clinical outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Management of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC: Heart Failure Position Statement.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Review
- Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- The Alternative Imaging Modalities in Ischemic Heart Failure (AIMI-HF) Trial-IMAGE HF Project 1A.CJC open · 2025Article
- Myocardial perfusion imaging in advanced coronary artery disease.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- AI-based identification of patients who benefit from revascularization: a multicenter study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative outcomes of invasive versus conservative strategy in stable coronary artery disease patients: a risk-stratification-based hypothesis-generative study.BMC medicine · 2025Observational
- Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: Wall Disease vs. Lumenopathy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Imaging approaches in risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease: a narrative review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors and development of a prediction model for long-term prognosis in patients with ischemic heart failure after percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Quantitative Ischemia, Early Revascularization, and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Multicenter Study.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- The clinical value of noninvasive left ventricular myocardial work in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in coronary heart disease: a comparative study with coronary flow reserve fraction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Effect of Coronary Collateral Supply on Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain after Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether an initial invasive strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia improves outcomes in the setting of a history of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) when ejection fraction is ≥35% but <45% is unknown.
methodsAmong 5179 participants randomized into ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), all of whom had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35%, we compared cardiovascular outcomes by treatment strategy in participants with a history of HF/LVD at baseline versus those without HF/LVD. Median follow-up was 3.2 years.
resultsThere were 398 (7.7%) participants with HF/LVD at baseline, of whom 177 had HF/LVEF >45%, 28 HF/LVEF 35% to 45%, and 193 LVEF 35% to 45% but no history of HF. HF/LVD was associated with more comorbidities at baseline, particularly previous myocardial infarction, stroke, and hypertension. Compared with patients without HF/LVD, participants with HF/LVD were more likely to experience a primary outcome composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, HF, or resuscitated cardiac arrest (4-year cumulative incidence rate, 22.7% versus 13.8%; cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, 19.7% versus 12.3%; and all-cause death or HF, 15.0% versus 6.9%). Participants with HF/LVD randomized to the invasive versus conservative strategy had a lower rate of the primary outcome (17.2% versus 29.3%; difference in 4-year event rate, -12.1% [95% CI, -22.6 to -1.6%]), whereas those without HF/LVD did not (13.0% versus 14.6%; difference in 4-year event rate, -1.6% [95% CI, -3.8% to 0.7%];
conclusionsISCHEMIA participants with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia with a history of HF or LVD were at increased risk for the primary outcome. In the small, high-risk subgroup with HF and LVEF 35% to 45%, an initial invasive approach was associated with better event-free survival. This result should be considered hypothesis-generating. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01471522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.