Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862518›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2020

Patient-reported outcomes in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction: focus on physical independence.

Weiting Huang, Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng, Wan Ting Tay, Arthur Mark Richards, Umesh Kadam, Claire A Lawson, Wataru Shimizu, Seet Yoong Loh, Inder Anand, Carolyn Su Ping Lam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic value of quality of life and functional status in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 9 countries.

Weiting HuangNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Tiew-Hwa Katherine TengNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Wan Ting TayNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
Arthur Mark RichardsCardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Umesh KadamDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Claire A LawsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Wataru ShimizuNippon Medical School Teaching Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Seet Yoong LohTan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Inder AnandVeterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Carolyn Su Ping LamNational Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
National Heart Centre Singapore · SGUniversity of Leicester · GBGeorge Institute for Global Health · CNNippon Medical School Hospital · JPTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGTiGenix (Spain) · ESUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

A*STAR Biomedical Research Council SPF2014/003A*STAR Biomedical Research Council SPF2014/004A*STAR Biomedical Research Council SPF2014/005BayerDepartment of Health NIHR300111National Medical Research Council R-172-003-219-511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure in heart failure (HF). The KCCQ was validated in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), leaving knowledge gaps regarding its applicability in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study addresses the psychometric properties of internal consistency and reliability, construct, and known-group validity of KCCQ in both HFrEF and HFpEF. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the KCCQ and their prognostic significance in HFpEF and HFrEF, within a large prospective multinational HF cohort. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined the 23-item KCCQ in the prospective multinational ASIAN-HF study [4470 HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%); 921 HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%)]. Internal consistency (using Cronbach's alpha) showed high reliability in HFrEF and HFpeF: functional status score: 0.89 and 0.91 and clinical summary score: 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis in HFrEF validated the five original domains of KCCQ (physical function, symptoms, self-efficacy, social limitation, and quality of life); in HFpEF, questions measuring physical function and social limitation had strong correlation (r = 0.66) and different domains emerged. We proposed an additional physical independence summary score, especially in HFpEF (comprising the original physical function and social limitation domains), which showed good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and has comparable receiver operating characteristic curve 0.766 ± 0.037 with the clinical summary score (receiver operating characteristic curve 0.774 ± 0.037), in predicting 1 year death and/or HF hospitalization.

conclusionsOur results confirmed the robustness of the KCCQ clinical summary score in HF regardless of ejection fraction group. In the assessment of physical capacity in HFpEF, our results suggest strong interaction with social limitation, and we propose a summary score comprising both components be used.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeSurveys and QuestionnairesHeart failureKansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnairePatient-reported outcomesPsychometric propertiesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32862518
PMCPMC7524068
OpenAlexW3082468031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.