Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862494›Full record

ReviewNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2021

Review of Preterm Human-Milk Nutrient Composition.

Amy Gates, Terri Marin, Gianluca De Leo, Brian K Stansfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Lyophilized (freeze-dried) human milk for preterm infants: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Influence of maternal and perinatal factors on macronutrient content of very preterm human milk during the first weeks after birth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy GatesCollege of Allied Health, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5500-543X
Terri MarinCollege of Nursing, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-0472
Gianluca De LeoCollege of Allied Health, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-8360
Brian K StansfieldDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1105-8895

Funding

Inflammation and retinopathy of prematurityR01EY029318 · NEI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI STANSFIELD, BRIAN KEVIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human milk-fed preterm infant is at risk for growth failure, micronutrient deficiencies, and neurocognitive delay. Although protective and better tolerated than formula, human milk alone cannot meet the high nutrient requirements of this population, and fortification is necessary. Clinicians use assumptions of preterm human-milk composition to determine the type and quantity of fortification.

objectivesThe objectives of this review were to identify evidence of macronutrient and micronutrient concentration in preterm human milk and to identify knowledge gaps regarding composition.

methodsPubMed and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were used to identify original articles published between January 1950 and December 2019.

resultsTwenty-seven articles were found containing original data on macronutrients and micronutrients. Most (67%) of the studies published after 2011 measured the macronutrients and included gestational ages from 28 to 36 weeks. Milk collection methods, experimental design, and analytical methods varied between studies. There are 15 countries represented in this review; all of the American studies (n = 7) were published from 1980 to 1984.

conclusionsAfrican American women, or women delivering before 28 weeks' gestation are not represented in the literature. Accurate and targeted human-milk fortification depends on comprehensive, complete, and representative human-milk nutrient data. We have aggregated all available preterm human-milk macronutrient and micronutrient data and reported trends associated with lactation stage and gestational age. This report can aid in the design of feeding plans that are appropriate for the gestational age of the preterm infant and the lactation stage of the breastmilk.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMilk, HumanFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMicronutrientsNutrientsMicronutrientsNutrientshuman milkhuman-milk fortificationmacronutrientsmicronutrientspremature infant

Identifiers

PMID32862494
PMCPMC10037211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.