Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862442›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2020

Affective Disruption During Forced Ethanol Abstinence in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ Mice.

Matthew C Hartmann, Megan M Haney, Caitlin G Smith, Vivek Kumar, Alan M Rosenwasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mouse parasubthalamicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Chronic MAP4343 reverses escalated alcohol drinking in a mouse model of alcohol use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew C HartmannFrom the, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, (MCH, VK, AMR), University of Maine, Orono, Maine.ORCID 0000-0001-9676-5195
Megan M HaneyDepartment of Psychology, (MCH, MMH, CGS, AMR), University of Maine, Orono, Maine.
Caitlin G SmithDepartment of Psychology, (MCH, MMH, CGS, AMR), University of Maine, Orono, Maine.
Vivek KumarFrom the, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, (MCH, VK, AMR), University of Maine, Orono, Maine.
Alan M RosenwasserFrom the, Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, (MCH, VK, AMR), University of Maine, Orono, Maine.

Funding

Establishment and Characterization of Novel Mutant Mouse Models for the Addiction Research CommunityU01DA051235 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KUMAR, VIVEK · 2021 to 2025
$4.2M
Sequencing Mutant Mice With Altered Cocaine ResponsesU01DA041668 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KUMAR, VIVEK · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Dissection of Addiction Relevant Signal Integration by Cyfip2 through Precise Genome EngineeringR33DA050837 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI KUMAR, VIVEK · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA050837NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041668NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn alcohol-dependent individuals, acute alcohol withdrawal results in severe physiological disruption, including potentially lethal central nervous system hyperexcitability. Although benzodiazepines successfully mitigate such symptoms, this treatment does not significantly reduce recidivism rates in postdependent individuals. Instead, persistent affective disturbances that often emerge weeks to months after initial detoxification appear to play a significant role in relapse risk; however, it remains unclear whether genetic predispositions contribute to their emergence, severity, and/or duration. Interestingly, significant genotypic and phenotypic differences have been observed among distinct C57BL/6 (B6) substrains, and, in particular, C57BL/6J (B6J) mice have been found to reliably exhibit higher voluntary ethanol (EtOH) intake and EtOH preference compared to several C57BL/6N (B6N)-derived substrains. To date, however, B6 substrains have not been directly compared on measures of acute withdrawal severity or affective-behavioral disruption during extended abstinence.

methodsMale and female B6J and B6NJ mice were exposed to either a 7-day chronic intermittent EtOH vapor (CIE) protocol or to ordinary room air in inhalation chambers. Subsequently, blood EtOH concentrations and handling-induced convulsions were evaluated during acute withdrawal, and mice were then tested weekly for affective behavior on the sucrose preference test, light-dark box test, and forced swim test throughout 4 weeks of (forced) abstinence.

resultsDespite documented differences in voluntary EtOH intake between these substrains, we found little evidence for substrain differences in either acute withdrawal or long-term abstinence between B6J and B6NJ mice.

conclusionsIn B6J and B6NJ mice, both the acute and long-term sequelae of EtOH withdrawal are dependent on largely nonoverlapping gene networks relative to those underlying voluntary EtOH drinking.

Indexed as

AffectAlcohol AbstinenceAnimalsDepressionFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAffective BehaviorAlcohol AbstinenceB6JB6NJCIE

Identifiers

PMID32862442
PMCPMC11060412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.