Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862386›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2020

Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgery in Women with Early-stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Jing Chen, Fen-Fen Wang, Yan Zhang, Bin Yang, Ji-Hui Ai, Xin-Yu Wang, Xiao-Dong Cheng, Ke-Zhen Li

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fertility-Sparing Management in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of the female infertility risk associated with anti-cancer therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Fen-Fen WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Ji-Hui AiReproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xin-Yu WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Xiao-Dong ChengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China. chengxd@zju.edu.cn.
Ke-Zhen LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. tjkeke@126.com.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With delayed childbearing in women, preservation of fertility is an important issue for reproductive-age patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in patients with early-stage disease in order to preserve fertility and improve quality of life. In order to evaluate oncological safety, attitudes toward childbearing and reproductive outcomes in women with EOC who underwent FSS, this multicenter retrospective study was conducted. Between January 2005 and December 2014, total of 87 young women with FIGO stage I EOC were included, with their clinicopathologic parameters in relation to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) assessed. Attitudes toward childbearing, ovarian function and fertility were studied in women undergoing FSS (n=36). As a result, in contrast to radical surgery, FSS did not affect prognosis by Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank test; DFS: P=0.484; OS: P=0.125). However, two of the three recurrence cases and both death cases were in FSS group stage IC. All women undergoing FSS resumed regular menstrual periods after chemotherapy. Only 16 (44.44%) had tried to conceive, and 17 pregnancies occurred in 15 (93.75%) women. Among 20 women who did not attempt conception, the most common reason was not being married (70%), followed by already having children (15%). In summary, FSS is considered safe in young women with stage IA EOC. Regular menstruation and good obstetric outcomes can be achieved. This study also provides some insight into the attitudes and social factors regarding fertility in EOC patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleFertility PreservationHumansNeoplasm StagingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPregnancyPregnancy RatePrognosisQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysisepithelial ovarian cancerfertility outcomefertility preservationfertility sparing surgeryovarian function

Identifiers

PMID32862386
OpenAlexW3082642809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.