ArticleCurrent medical science2020
Associations between Lesion Locations and Stroke Recurrence in Survivors of First-ever Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Current medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Causal Association Study Between Brain Imaging Features and the Risk of Large Artery Atherosclerosis: A Two-sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- Do pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) exist in cerebral ischemia? Evidence from cell and rodent studies.Neural regeneration research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have indicated that stroke survivors with multiple lesions or with larger lesion volumes have a higher risk of stroke recurrence. However, the relationship between lesion locations and stroke recurrence is unclear. We conducted a prospective cohort study of first-ever ischemic stroke survivors who were consecutively enrolled from January 2010 to December 2015. Stroke recurrence was assessed every 3 months after post-discharge via telephone interviews by trained interviewers. Lesion locations were obtained from hospital-based MRI or CT scans and classified using two classification systems that were based on cerebral hemisphere or vascular territory and brain anatomical structures. Flexible parametric survival models using the proportional hazards scale (PH model) were used to analyze the time-to-event data. Among 633 survivors, 63.51% (n=402) had anterior circulation ischemia (ACI), and more than half of all ACIs occurred in the subcortex. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 117 (18.48%) survivors developed a recurrent stroke. The results of the multivariate PH model showed that survivors with non-brain lesions were at higher risk of recurrence than those with right-side lesions (HR, 2.79; 95%CI, 1.53, 5.08; P=0.001). There was no increase in risk among survivors with left-side lesions (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.53, 1.75; P=0.914) or both-side lesions (HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.75, 2.07; P=0.401) compared to those with right-side lesions. Additionally, there were no associations between stroke recurrence and lesion locations that were classified based on vascular territory and brain anatomical structures. It was concluded that first-ever ischemic stroke survivors with non-brain lesion had higher recurrence risk than those with right-side lesion, although no significant associations were found when the lesion locations were classified by vascular territory and brain anatomical structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.