ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Classification of error-related potentials from single-trial EEG in association with executed and imagined movements: a feature and classifier investigation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Error-related potentials in EEG signals: feature-based detection for human-robot interaction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Error-related potentials during multitasking involving sensorimotor control: an ERP and offline decoding study for brain-computer interface.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Single-Trial Classification of Error-Related Potentials in People with Motor Disabilities: A Study in Cerebral Palsy, Stroke, and Amputees.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Error-Related Potentials in Stroke Patients from EEG Using an Artificial Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Adding Tactile Feedback and Changing ISI to Improve BCI Systems' Robustness: An Error-Related Potential Study.Brain topography · 2021Article
- Induction of Neural Plasticity Using a Low-Cost Open Source Brain-Computer Interface and a 3D-Printed Wrist Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Error-related potentials (ErrPs) have been proposed for designing adaptive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Therefore, ErrPs must be decoded. The aim of this study was to evaluate ErrP decoding using combinations of different feature types and classifiers in BCI paradigms involving motor execution (ME) and imagination (MI). Fifteen healthy subjects performed 510 (ME) and 390 (MI) trials of right/left wrist extensions and foot dorsiflexions. Sham BCI feedback was delivered with an accuracy of 80% (ME) and 70% (MI). Continuous EEG was recorded and divided into ErrP and NonErrP epochs. Temporal, spectral, and discrete wavelet transform (DWT) marginals and template matching features were extracted, and all combinations of feature types were classified using linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and random forest classifiers. ErrPs were elicited for both ME and MI paradigms, and the average classification accuracies were significantly higher than the chance level. The highest average classification accuracy was obtained using temporal features and a combination of temporal + DWT features classified with random forest; 89 ± 9% and 83 ± 9% for ME and MI, respectively. These results generally indicate that temporal features should be used when detecting ErrPs, but there is great inter-subject variability, which means that user-specific features should be derived to maximize the performance. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32862336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.