Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862218›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2020

In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Kamilia Abdelraouf, Safa Almarzoky Abuhussain, David P Nicolau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ARGONAUT-III and -V: susceptibility of carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  16. Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamilia AbdelraoufCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Safa Almarzoky AbuhussainCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Hartford Hospital · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300019CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300019IWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 101999/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCefepime/taniborbactam is a cephalosporin/cyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor combination under development for the treatment of infections due to MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model, we aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index, relative to taniborbactam exposure, that correlated most closely with the efficacy of the cefepime/taniborbactam combination and the magnitude of index required for efficacy against serine-β-lactamase-producing strains.

methodsTwenty-six clinical Enterobacterales (expressing ESBLs, plasmid-mediated AmpC and/or carbapenemases of classes A or D; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 0.06-16 mg/L) and 11 clinical P. aeruginosa (AmpC overproducing or KPC expressing; cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs 1-16 mg/L) were evaluated. A cefepime human-simulated regimen (HSR) equivalent to a clinical dose of 2 g q8h as a 2 h infusion was given in combination with taniborbactam for 24 h. For a subset of P. aeruginosa isolates, a sub-therapeutic cefepime exposure was utilized.

resultsDose-fractionation studies revealed that dosing frequency had no impact on taniborbactam potentiation of cefepime activity. Relative to the initial bacterial burden, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 log kill in combination with the cefepime HSR for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was 2.62 and 0.46, respectively. In combination with sub-therapeutic cefepime, the median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with 1 and 2 log kill against AmpC-overproducing P. aeruginosa was 2.00 and 3.30, respectively, relative to the bacterial burden in the cefepime-treated groups. The taniborbactam HSR (equivalent to 0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) was adequate to attain ≥1 log reduction against all test isolates.

conclusionsOur data show that the cefepime/taniborbactam combination (2 g/0.5 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) exerts potent in vivo activity against cefepime-resistant isolates, including serine-carbapenemase producers.

Indexed as

beta-Lactamase InhibitorsSerineAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesBorinic AcidsCarboxylic AcidsCefepimeCephalosporinsHumansMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesBorinic AcidsCarboxylic AcidsCefepimeCephalosporinsSerinetaniborbactam

Identifiers

PMID32862218
PMCPMC7662185
OpenAlexW3081968625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.