Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862128›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

App-Based Delivery of Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques: Cross-Sectional Study of App User Self-Ratings.

Dawson Church, Peta Stapleton, Debbie Sabot

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06338085 (The Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique on Depressive and Menopausal Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06338085 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Emotional Freedom Technique on Depressive and Menopausal Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorMeryem Vural ŞahinRan2023 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsMenopauseArmsemotional liberation technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT): Tap to relieve stress and burnout.Journal of interprofessional education & practice · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dawson Church *National Institute for Integrative Healthcare, Fulton, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7324-3140
Peta Stapleton *School of Psychology, Faculty of Society & Design, Bond University, Robina, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9916-7481
Debbie Sabot *School of Psychology, Faculty of Society & Design, Bond University, Robina, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-8429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burgeoning area of mobile health (mHealth) has experienced rapid growth in mobile apps designed to address mental health issues. Although abundant apps offer strategies for managing symptoms of anxiety and stress, information regarding their efficacy is scarce.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the effect of an mHealth app on user self-ratings of psychological distress in a sample of 270,461 app users. The Tapping Solution App guides users through the therapeutic protocols of Clinical Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT), an evidence-based psychophysiological intervention that combines acupressure with elements of cognitive and exposure therapies.

methodsApp users provided self-ratings of emotional intensity before and after app sessions (termed "tapping meditations") using an 11-point Subjective Units of Distress scale. App user data for 23 tapping meditations, which addressed psychological symptoms of anxiety and stress, were gathered between October 2018 and October 2019, totaling 380,034 completed app sessions.

resultsAcross 12 anxiety-tapping meditations, the difference in emotional intensity ratings from presession (mean 6.66, SD 0.25) to postsession (mean 3.75, SD 0.30) was statistically significant (P<.001; 95% CI -2.92 to -2.91). Across 11 stress-tapping meditations, a statistically significant difference was also found from presession (mean 6.91, SD 0.48) to postsession (mean 3.83, SD 0.54; P<.001; 95% CI -3.08 to -3.07). The results are consistent with the literature on the efficacy of Clinical EFT for anxiety and stress when offered in conventional therapeutic formats.

conclusionsThe findings provide preliminary support for the effectiveness of the mHealth app in the immediate reduction of self-rated psychological distress. As an adjunct to professional mental health care, the app promises accessible and convenient therapeutic benefits.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFreedomHumansanxietyEmotional Freedom Techniques (EFT)meditationmobile healthmobile phonestress

Identifiers

PMID32862128
PMCPMC7593862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.