Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020

A case report of complete appendiceal duplication on the normal site of a single caecum: A new variant?

Allan Ngulube, Crispin O M Ntoto, Derek Matsika, Wedu Ndebele, Ngqabutho Sanders Dube, Paradzai Gapu

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allan NgulubeMidlands State University, P. Bag 9055 Senga Road, Gweru, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: drngulube@gmail.com.
Crispin O M NtotoNational University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 2096, Bulawayo, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: crispin112@gmail.com.
Derek MatsikaDepartment of Surgery, Mpilo Central Hospital, P.O Box 2096, Bulawayo, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: drderekmatsika@gmail.com.
Wedu NdebeleNational University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 2096, Bulawayo, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: wndebele@yahoo.co.uk.
Ngqabutho Sanders DubeNational University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 2096, Bulawayo, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: drngqa@gmail.com.
Paradzai GapuNational University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 2096, Bulawayo, +263, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: drpgapu@gmail.com.
National University of Science and Technology · ZWMidlands State University · ZWMpilo Central Hospital · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuplicated appendix is an uncommon entity, typically discovered as an incidental finding during surgery for appendicitis or other abdominal pathologies. It may be associated with other congenital malformations. We report a case of a male neonate incidentally discovered to have an unrecognized variant of duplicated appendix during a laparotomy plus diversion colostomy for imperforate anus at 4 days of age. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A baby delivered at home from an unbooked pregnancy at term, was referred from a primary care clinic to a specialist referral hospital, with a fever and suspected neonatal sepsis on day 1 of life. The patient had not passed meconium and physical examination revealed an imperforate anus. After initiating treatment for sepsis, the patient underwent a laparotomy where a situs inversus totalis and complete appendiceal duplication was found, with both appendices on the normal site of a single caecum. The appendices were left in situ and a diversion colostomy was performed. The patient did well following surgery and was discharged on postoperative day 10 to await definitive surgery. DISCUSSION: Appendiceal malformations have been reported either in isolation or in association with other congenital anomalies. Duplicated appendix occurs rarely and the pathogenesis is not fully understood. This case adds more evidence that the classification of appendiceal abnormalities should continue evolving as newer types are described.

conclusionSurgeons operating on patients with congenital anomalies must exercise extreme vigilance to identify and document other rare pathologies that may later pose challenges thus avoid morbidity, mortality and potential medicolegal pitfalls.

Indexed as

Case reportCongenital anomalyDuplicated appendixSitus inversus totalis

Identifiers

PMID32862109
PMCPMC7475232
OpenAlexW3075666557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.