Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32862080›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2020

General solution for rapid scan EPR deconvolution problem.

Mark Tseytlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Real-Time Monitoring of Photoinduced pH Jumps byThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid scan EPR: Automated digital resonator control for low-latency data acquisition.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
  6. Advances in rapid scan EPR spectroscopy.Methods in enzymology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark TseytlinBiochemistry Department, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; In Vivo Multifunctional Magnetic Resonance Center at Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. Electronic address: mark.tseytlin@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Anne Courtney DeVries · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
PET-EPRIR01EB023888 · NIBIB · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI RAYLMAN, RAYMOND ROBERT, TSEYTLIN, MARK · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023888NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A general solution for the RS EPR deconvolution problem has been derived. This solution permits the use of arbitrary magnetic field scans. As a result, constraints on the current experimental designs can be lifted. For example, a trapezoidal waveform can be used to accelerate the scan rate without affecting the signal bandwidth. The assumptions made to develop the previous algorithms are mathematically validated.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectromagnetic FieldsElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWavelet AnalysisDeconvolutionLinear systemRapid scan EPR

Identifiers

PMID32862080
PMCPMC7575242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.