ArticleThe American journal of the medical sciences2020
Relationship Between Estrogen Treatment and Skeletal Health in Women With Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updates in Cystic Fibrosis Bone Disease in Adults.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2026Review
- Endocrine Complications of Cystic Fibrosis.Clinics in chest medicine · 2022Review
- Use of estrogen supplementation is associated with higher quality of life scores in women with cystic fibrosis.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2022Article
- Treatment of cystic fibrosis related bone disease.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2022Article
- Optimizing sexual and reproductive health across the lifespan in people with cystic fibrosis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at risk for CF-related bone disease. Women with CF may use estrogen supplementation for reasons other than skeletal health. It is unknown whether estrogen therapy has a beneficial impact on skeletal health in women with CF.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study of women with CF followed at a single CF center, the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) of women with CF exposed to supplemental and not exposed to supplemental estrogen were compared. Spline function models included the main effect of estrogen exposure and the interaction between age and estrogen supplementation.
resultsOf the 145 subjects analyzed, 44 subjects were exposed to supplemental estrogen. The baseline characteristics of estrogen exposed and unexposed subjects were similar except for use of CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators and anti-osteoporosis medications. Women exposed to estrogen reached peak BMD around 21 years of age, but women not exposed to estrogen reached peak BMD around 25 years of age. A significant interaction of age and estrogen supplementation indicated that the lumbar spine BMD trajectories differed by exposure group.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that few women with CF of reproductive age are prescribed estrogen therapy. Furthermore, estrogen exposure up to age 21 is associated with improved BMD, but estrogen exposure after age 21 does not appear to be associated with improved BMD. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for the low rates of estrogen use in young women with CF and the optimal timing, dose and formulation of estrogen prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.