Trial reportIndian heart journal
Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy - A randomized control trial.
Trial report in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05147831 (Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiograms.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiograms.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Management Considerations for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Chronic Kidney Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of sufficient data regarding the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients at risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Thus, this study was conducted to determine whether RIPC as an adjunct to standard therapy prevents CIN in high-risk patients undergoing coronary intervention.
methodsIn a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 162 patients who were at risk of CIN received standard hydration combined with RIPC or hydration with sham preconditioning. RIPC was accomplished by four cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion of the forearm. The primary endpoint was a rise in serum creatinine (>0.5 mg/dL or >25%) from baseline to serum creatinine 48-72 h after contrast administration.
resultsOf the 162 patients, 81 were randomly allocated to receive sham preconditioning and 81 to receive RIPC. Significantly reduced serum creatinine levels were observed in patients with a Mehran moderate risk allocated to sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.070 ± 0.16 mg/dL vs. 0.107 ± 0.13 mg/dL, p = 0.001). With regards to the primary endpoint, a significantly higher change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48-72 h was observed in the sham group compared to the RIPC group (0.023 ± 0.2 μmol/L vs -0.064 ± 0.1 μmol/L, p < 0.001).
conclusionRIPC as an alternative to standard therapy, improved serum creatinine levels after contrast administration in patients at risk of CIN. However, present data indicate that RIPC might have beneficial effects in patients with a moderate or high risk of CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.