Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32861136›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2020

A systematic review and meta-analysis of medications for stimulant use disorders in patients with co-occurring opioid use disorders.

Brian Chan, Michele Freeman, Chelsea Ayers, P Todd Korthuis, Robin Paynter, Karli Kondo, Devan Kansagara

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Study of the MTHFR Gene Prevalence in a Rural Tennessee Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Center Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian ChanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Central City Concern, Portland, OR, United States. Electronic address: chanbri@ohsu.edu.
Michele FreemanEvidence Synthesis Program Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Chelsea AyersEvidence Synthesis Program Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
P Todd KorthuisDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Robin PaynterEvidence Synthesis Program Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Karli KondoEvidence Synthesis Program Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Devan KansagaraDivision of General Internal Medicine, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Evidence Synthesis Program Center, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States; Department of Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
VA Portland Health Care System · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCARTY, DENNIS, SORENSEN, JAMES L · 2002 to 2015
$25.2M
Western States Node of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (TMS for CUD) UG1DA015815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Keith N. Humphreys, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2015 to 2026
$24.6M
Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Oregon HIV/Hepatitis and Opioid Prevention and Engagement (OR-HOPE) StudyUG3DA044831 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KORTHUIS, PHILIP TODD · 2017 to 2018
$895k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA015815NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStimulant (cocaine and/or methamphetamine) use has increased among people with opioid use disorder. We conducted a systematic review of medications for stimulant use disorders in this population.

methodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials in multiple databases through April 2019, and dual-screened studies using pre-specified inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were abstinence defined as stimulant-negative urine screens for ≥3 consecutive weeks; overall use as the proportion of stimulant-negative urine specimens; and retention as the proportion of participants who completed treatment. We rated strength of evidence using established criteria and conducted meta-analyses of comparable interventions and outcomes.

resultsThirty-four trials of 22 medications focused on cocaine use disorder in patients with opioid use disorder. Most studies enrolled participants stabilized on opioid maintenence therapy, generally methadone. None of the six studies that assessed abstinence found significant differences between groups. We found moderate-strength evidence that antidepressants (desipramine, bupropion, and fluoxetine) worsened retention. There was moderate-strength evidence that disulfiram worsened treatment retention (N = 605, RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.77 to 0.95). We found low-strength evidence that psychostimulants (mazindol and dexamphetamine) may reduce cocaine use, though the difference was not statistically significant (standard mean difference 0.35 [95 % CI -0.05 to 0.74]). There was only 1 trial for methamphetamine use disorder, which showed insufficient-strength evidence for naltrexone.

conclusionsCo-occurring stimulant/opioid use disorder is an important problem for targeting future research. Medication trials for methamphetamine use disorder are lacking in this population. Most of the medications studied for cocaine use were ineffective, although psychostimulants warrant further study.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsAnalgesics, OpioidAntidepressive AgentsCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMethadoneNaltrexoneOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAntidepressive AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineMethadoneNaltrexoneAmphetamineCocainePharmacotherapyStimulantSubstance use disorderSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32861136
PMCPMC8562993
OpenAlexW3046248416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.