Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32861047›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2021

A Scoping Review of International Barriers to Asthma Medication Adherence Mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Isaretta L Riley, Bryonna Jackson, Donna Crabtree, Shaun Riebl, Loretta G Que, Roy Pleasants, L Ebony Boulware

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Asthma and COVID-19: a systematic review.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isaretta L RileyDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. Electronic address: isaretta.riley@duke.edu.
Bryonna JacksonDuke Asthma, Allergy & Airway Center, Durham, NC.
Donna CrabtreeDuke Office of Clinical Research, Durham, NC.
Shaun RieblFairhaven Treatment Center, Cordova, Tenn.
Loretta G QueDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Roy PleasantsGillings School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
L Ebony BoulwareDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

Funding

Research Project 3U54MD012530 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KIMBERLY S. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD015545NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, adult asthma medication adherence rates are low. Studies characterizing variations in barriers by country are lacking.

objectiveTo conduct a scoping review to characterize international variations in barriers to asthma medication adherence among adults.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), and CINAHL were searched from inception to February 2017. English-language studies employing qualitative methods (eg, focus groups, interviews) were selected to assess adult patient- and/or caregiver-reported barriers to asthma medication adherence. Two investigators independently identified, extracted data, and collected study characteristics, methodologic approach, and barriers. Barriers were mapped using the Theoretical Domains Framework and findings categorized according to participants' country of residence, countries' gross national income, and the presence of universal health care (World Health Organization definitions).

resultsAmong 2942 unique abstracts, we reviewed 809 full texts. Among these, we identified 47 studies, conducted in 12 countries, meeting eligibility. Studies included a total of 2614 subjects, predominately female (67%), with the mean age of 19.1 to 70 years. Most commonly reported barriers were beliefs about consequences (eg, medications not needed for asthma control, N = 29, 61.7%) and knowledge (eg, not knowing when to take medication, N = 27, 57.4%); least common was goals (eg, asthma not a priority, N = 1, 2.1%). In 27 studies conducted in countries classified as high income (HIC) with universal health care (UHC), the most reported barrier was participants' beliefs about consequences (N = 17, 63.3%). However, environmental context and resources (N = 12, 66.7%) were more common in HIC without UHC.

conclusionInternational adherence barriers are diverse and may vary with a country's sociopolitical context. Future adherence interventions should account for trends.

Indexed as

AsthmaMedication AdherenceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultAfrican AmericanAsthmaBehavioral researchBehavior changeBlackComplianceGross national incomeMedication adherenceQualitative researchTheoretical Domains FrameworkUniversal health careWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID32861047
PMCPMC8006066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.