Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860881›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

A comparison of Freesurfer and multi-atlas MUSE for brain anatomy segmentation: Findings about size and age bias, and inter-scanner stability in multi-site aging studies.

Dhivya Srinivasan, Guray Erus, Jimit Doshi, David A Wolk, Haochang Shou, Mohamad Habes, Christos Davatzikos, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A unified model for staging amyloid and tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dhivya SrinivasanCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Electronic address: Dhivya.Srinivasan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Guray ErusCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Jimit DoshiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
David A WolkDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Haochang ShouCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Mohamad HabesCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Christos DavatzikosCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Preclinical AD ConsortiumRF1AG059869 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERT, MARILYN S. · 2018 to 2018
$7.7M
Machine Learning and Large-scale Imaging analytics for dimensional representations of brain trajectories in aging and preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: The brain aging chart and the iSTAGING consortiumRF1AG054409 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2023
$6.3M
Mapping Heterogeneity of Neuroanatomical Imaging Signatures of Psychosis via Pattern AnalysisR01MH112070 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054409NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059869NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057NIDA NIH HHS 75N95019C00022NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201300284PNIH HHS S10 OD023495NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic segmentation of brain anatomy has been a key processing step in quantitative neuroimaging analyses. An extensive body of literature has relied on Freesurfer segmentations. Yet, in recent years, the multi-atlas segmentation framework has consistently obtained results with superior accuracy in various evaluations. We compared brain anatomy segmentations from Freesurfer, which uses a single probabilistic atlas strategy, against segmentations from Multi-atlas region Segmentation utilizing Ensembles of registration algorithms and parameters and locally optimal atlas selection (MUSE), one of the leading ensemble-based methods that calculates a consensus segmentation through fusion of anatomical labels from multiple atlases and registrations. The focus of our evaluation was twofold. First, using manual ground-truth hippocampus segmentations, we found that Freesurfer segmentations showed a bias towards over-segmentation of larger hippocampi, and under-segmentation in older age. This bias was more pronounced in Freesurfer-v5.3, which has been used in multiple previous studies of aging, while the effect was mitigated in more recent Freesurfer-v6.0, albeit still present. Second, we evaluated inter-scanner segmentation stability using same day scan pairs from ADNI acquired on 1.5T and 3T scanners. We also found that MUSE obtains more consistent segmentations across scanners compared to Freesurfer, particularly in the deep structures.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSoftwareAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrainFemaleHippocampusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleOrgan SizeReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBrainFreesurferMRIMUSEROISegmentation

Identifiers

PMID32860881
PMCPMC8382092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.