ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2021
Multivariate model for cooperation: bridging social physiological compliance and hyperscanning.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-brain processes during Live and Represented social moments are inter-related and shaped by behavioral synchrony.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Empathy aligns brains in synchrony.iScience · 2025Article
- Non-verbal joint action in healthy adults: a systematic scoping review of EEG-hyperscanning research.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Mutual information-based teamwork evaluation in real-world environments: an exploratory investigation with professional surgeons.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
- Optimizing EEG Signal Integrity: A Comprehensive Guide to Ocular Artifact Correction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Sensitive infant care tunes a frontotemporal interbrain network in adolescence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cooperation objective evaluation in aviation: validation and comparison of two novel approaches in simulated environment.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Gender differences in cognitive and affective interpersonal emotion regulation in couples: an fNIRS hyperscanning.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Article
- Pseudo-mutual gazing enhances interbrain synchrony during remote joint attention tasking.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- An ecological study protocol for the multimodal investigation of the neurophysiological underpinnings of dyadic joint action.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Time-varying information measures: an adaptive estimation of information storage with application to brain-heart interactions.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Article
- Being 'in sync'-is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Estimation of Granger causality through Artificial Neural Networks: applications to physiological systems and chaotic electronic oscillators.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neurophysiological analysis of cooperation has evolved over the past 20 years, moving towards the research of common patterns in neurophysiological signals of people interacting. Social physiological compliance (SPC) and hyperscanning represent two frameworks for the joint analysis of autonomic and brain signals, respectively. Each of the two approaches allows to know about a single layer of cooperation according to the nature of these signals: SPC provides information mainly related to emotions, and hyperscanning that related to cognitive aspects. In this work, after the analysis of the state of the art of SPC and hyperscanning, we explored the possibility to unify the two approaches creating a complete neurophysiological model for cooperation considering both affective and cognitive mechanisms We synchronously recorded electrodermal activity, cardiac and brain signals of 14 cooperative dyads. Time series from these signals were extracted, and multivariate Granger causality was computed. The results showed that only when subjects in a dyad cooperate there is a statistically significant causality between the multivariate variables representing each subject. Moreover, the entity of this statistical relationship correlates with the dyad's performance. Finally, given the novelty of this approach and its exploratory nature, we provided its strengths and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.