Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860674›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020

5-Fluorouracil Rechallenge After Cardiotoxicity.

Aakash Desai, Turab Mohammed, Kunal N Patel, Mansour Almnajam, Agnes S Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain-heart: first case report of simultaneous toxicity of 5-fluorouracil.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Coronary atherosclerosis and chemotherapy: From bench to bedside.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aakash DesaiDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Turab MohammedDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Kunal N PatelDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.
Mansour AlmnajamDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Agnes S KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
UConn Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely used intravenous chemotherapy agent that is highly effective in the treatment of a variety of solid malignancies. Cardiotoxicity related to 5-FU is a complex clinical entity associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Whether a patient who experienced a major cardiac side effect from 5-FU can be safely rechallenged with this drug is a clinical dilemma. CASE REPORT We present the case of a patient with stage III colorectal adenocarcinoma who experienced ventricular fibrillation during the first cycle of FOLFOX (5-FU, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin) regimen in the adjuvant setting. Post-resuscitation electrocardiogram revealed ST-elevation in the inferior leads with reciprocal changes. Coronary angiogram revealed no obstructive coronary artery disease. Cardiac workup led to the conclusion of probable fluorouracil-induced vasospasm as the cause of his cardiac arrest. He received implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The decision was made to hold 5-FU. At 3-month follow-up, there was evidence of progressive metastasis. After comprehensive risk-benefit discussions, the decision was made for palliative chemotherapy using 5-FU/leucovorin. A pre-treatment regimen including isosorbide dinitrate, diltiazem, and metoprolol was used. The patient tolerated 5-FU rechallenge without recurrent cardiovascular complication. CONCLUSIONS The cardiotoxicity profile of 5-FU can range from anginal chest pain to sudden cardiac death. When considering 5-FU rechallenge, clinicians should adopt a multidisciplinary approach, favor using prophylactic antianginal therapy, change to bolus dosing, and use continuous telemetry monitoring. Screening patients for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency prior to 5-FU administration may facilitate an individualized strategy for optimal dosing and safety.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsFluorouracilAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCardiotoxicityHumansLeucovorinMaleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticFluorouracilLeucovorin

Identifiers

PMID32860674
PMCPMC7483515
OpenAlexW3045660217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.