Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860553›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Accuracy of noninvasive blood pressure measured at the ankle during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Sherin Refaat, Maha Mostafa, Ahmed Hasanin, Nadeem Rujubali, Reham Fouad, Yasmin Hassabelnaby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04199156 (Evaluation of the Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measured at the Ankle During Cesarean Delivery Compared to the Arm), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04199156 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measured at the Ankle During Cesarean Delivery Compared to the Arm: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKasr El Aini HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsNon-invasive Blood Pressure, Cesarean Delivery, Spinal Anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sherin RefaatDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Maha MostafaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. maha.mostafa@cu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0001-6148-6727
Ahmed HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nadeem RujubaliDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Reham FouadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yasmin HassabelnabyDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measured at the ankle in detecting low arm NIBP during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, a cohort of full-term mothers undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia was examined. Simultaneous NIBP measurements were obtained from the arm and the ankle. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the ankle NIBP in detecting arm systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg. Other outcomes included the accuracy of ankle NIBP in detecting SBP < 80% of the baseline value. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of ankle NIBP in detecting low arm NIBP. The Bland-Altman analysis was conducted to evaluate the agreement between values. We analyzed 1729 pairs of readings obtained from 97 mothers. Ankle SBP showed good accuracy in detecting SBP < 90 mmHg, with an AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.90 (0.89-0.91) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99 (98-99%) at a cutoff value of ≤ 103 mmHg. Furthermore, ankle SBP showed good accuracy in detecting SBP < 80% of the baseline value, with an AUC (95% CI) of 0.84 (0.82-0.89) and an NPV of 95 (93-96%) at a cutoff value of ≤ 76% of the ankle baseline SBP. The mean bias between the two sites of measurement was - 5.4 ± 15.5, - 2.0 ± 11, and 0.5 ± 12.1 mmHg for SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure, respectively. In conclusion, ankle NIBP measurement is not interchangeable with arm NIBP measurement. However, ankle NIBP measurement showed good accuracy for ruling out low arm NIBP during a cesarean delivery.Clinical trial rejistration: NCT04199156.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalAnkleBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHumansOscillometryPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32860553
OpenAlexW3081864201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.