ReviewArchives of osteoporosis2020
Updated approach for the management of osteoporosis in Turkey: a consensus report.
Review in Archives of osteoporosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Specialty-based differences in osteoporosis management in Türkiye: a national cross-sectional survey.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Analysis of Facial Skeleton Textures in CBCT as an Early Warning Sign of Osteoporosis-A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and regional distribution of osteoporosis in adults aged 75 years and older: a quantitative computed tomography-based retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Osteoporosis treatment gap after hip fracture: data from a tertiary center in Turkey.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- Short-Term Exercise Improves Not Only Muscle Strength But Also Lung Capacity, Endurance, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Vertebral Osteoporosis.Archives of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Osteoporosis management in patients presenting to the emergency department with fragility fractures: A retrospective observational study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Teriparatide-induced Sever Persistent Hypercalcemia in an Osteoporotic Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Is it advisable for Asians to drink milk, especially those at risk of osteoporosis?Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Center.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Osteoporosis knowledge and awareness among rheumatoid arthritis patients: A cross-sectional controlled study.Archives of rheumatology · 2024Article
- The epidemiology of osteoporosis in Türkiye: A comprehensive analysis using the e-Nabız database.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- A Review of Various Clinical Practice Guidelines on Osteoporosis in the Last 5 Years.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Osteoporosis: Spotlight on current approaches to pharmacological treatment.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- "A natural consequence of aging in women?": a mixed-method exploration on osteoporosis self-efficacy in Turkey.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Article
- The current situation in the approach to osteoporosis in older adults in Turkey: areas in need of improvement with a model for other populations.Archives of osteoporosis · 2021Review
- Orthogeriatrics: a vital requirement for improving fragility fracture patient care internationally with particular reference to Turkey.Archives of osteoporosis · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a result of the current demographics, increased projections of osteoporosis (OP) and prevalence of the disease in Turkey, a panel of multidisciplinary experts developed a thorough review to assist clinicians in identifying OP and associated fracture risk patients, diagnosing the disease with the appropriate available diagnostic methods, classifying the disease, and initiating appropriate treatment. The panel expects to increase the awareness of this prevalent disease, decrease consequences of OP with corresponding cost savings and, ultimately, decrease the overall burden of OP and related fractures in Turkey.
backgroundOP is not officially accepted as a chronic disease in Turkey despite the high prevalence and predicted increase in the following years. However, there are areas where the country is performing well, such as having a country-specific fracture risk assessment model, DXA access, and the uptake of FRAX. Additional efforts are required to decrease the existing treatment gap estimating 75-90% of patients do not receive pharmacological intervention for secondary prevention, and the diagnosis rate is around 25%.
methodsA selected panel of Turkish experts in fields related to osteoporosis was provided with a series of relevant questions to address prior to the multi-day conference. Within this conference, each narrative was discussed and edited by the entire group, through numerous drafts and rounds of discussion until a consensus was achieved. Represented in the panel were a number of societies including The Turkish Osteoporosis Society, The Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism of Turkey (SEMT), and The Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
resultsStandardized general guidelines to identify OP and related fractures and at-risk population in Turkey, which will enable clinicians to accurately and effectively diagnose the disease, treat the appropriate patients with available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and decrease the burden of the disease.
conclusionsThis manuscript provides a review of the current state of OP and related fractures in Turkey. Moreover, this manuscript reviews current international guidelines and national studies and proposes a number of helpful country-specific classifications that can be used by healthcare providers caring for the at-risk population. Additionally, the panel proposes practical recommendations that should be implemented nationally in order to decrease the burden of OP and related fractures and effectively preventing the burden in future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.