Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860545›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2020

Rate of anastomotic leak following right hemicolectomy by general surgical trainees.

Chu Woon Ng, Swetha Prabhakaran, Joy Chakraborty, Nicholas Lutton, Peter Gourlas, Christopher Gillespie, Joseph Cherng Huei Kong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chu Woon NgDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Swetha PrabhakaranDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia. swethaprabhakaran910@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-5247
Joy ChakrabortyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Nicholas LuttonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Peter GourlasDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Christopher GillespieDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Joseph Cherng Huei KongDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-2480
Princess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerforming a right hemicolectomy (RH) is a core technical competency for general surgical trainees. There is a concern that anastomotic leaks occur more frequently when patients are operated on by trainees rather than by surgeons. This study aims to analyse the quality of care outcomes after RH, stratified by the experience level of the operator.

methodsPatients were retrospectively recruited from the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) Registry, from 2007 to 2018. All patients who underwent a RH for colorectal cancer were eligible. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak rate.

resultsA total of 6548 eligible right hemicolectomies were identified, with 74% being performed by consultants, 12% by fellows, and 14% by surgical trainees. The overall incidence of an anastomotic leak was 2.1%, with the highest rate of 3.7% noted among supervised registrars. Positive resection margin rate was the highest among unsupervised trainees at 10.5%, as compared with 4.3% among consultants. Anastomotic leak, anastomotic bleeding, prolonged ileus, and pneumonia occurred significantly less frequently with consultant surgeons, as compared with trainees. Independent risk factors for anastomotic leak were urgent surgery, extended right hemicolectomy, conversion to open surgery, and a lower level of operator seniority. Two independent risk factors were identified for inpatient mortality-a high ASA score (III and above) and urgent surgery.

conclusionRH is a common operative procedure in general surgical training. Data from this study may assist with the structuring of surgical training programmes, aimed at maximising both patient safety and trainee professional development and education.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansIleusRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic leakRight hemicolectomySurgical trainingTrainees

Identifiers

PMID32860545
OpenAlexW3082972313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.