ArticleWorld journal of urology2021
Impact of COVID-19 on medical education: introducing homo digitalis.
Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Treatment Outcome of Smart Device-Based Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Trial
- Article
- The perspectives of learners at a public medical school on the evaluation of an online learning management system for degree and non-degree courses.Medical education online · 2024Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Educational and Academic Activities of Healthcare Professionals in Bahrain.Cureus · 2023Article
- [Development of the INSABI educational strategy: a lesson learned from the COVID-19 epidemic].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- Uptake and effectiveness of online diabetes continuing education: The perspectives of Thai general practitioner trainees.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Internal Medicine Resident Perspectives on Format of Didactics during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2023Article
- Factors Associated With Specialists' Intention to Adopt New Behaviors After Taking Web-Based Continuing Professional Development Courses: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Introducing Audio Podcasts into a Practical Laboratory Course for Pharmacy Students as a Novel Tool for Performance Assessment.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Web-Based Training for Nurses on Using a Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision-making About Prenatal Screening: Parallel Controlled Trial.JMIR nursing · 2022Article
- Personalised versus non-individualised case-based CME: A randomised pilot study.Journal of European CME · 2022Article
- The impact the COVID-19 pandemic on urology literature: a bibliometric analysis.Central European journal of urology · 2022Review
- Global survey to assess preferences when attending virtual orthodontic learning sessions: optimising uptake from virtual lectures.Progress in orthodontics · 2021Article
- COVID19: the response of the urologist.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Observations from Transforming a Continuing Education programme in the COVID-19 Era and Preparing for the Future.Journal of European CME · 2021Article
- How the COVID-19 pandemic changed urology residency - a nationwide survey from the Portuguese resident's perspective.Central European journal of urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 17 institutions in 15 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine how members of the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) are continuing their education in the time of COVID-19.
methodsA survey was disseminated amongst SIU members worldwide by email. Results were analyzed to examine the influence of age, practice region and settings on continuing medical education (CME) of the respondents.
resultsIn total, 2494 respondents completed the survey. Internet searching was the most common method of CME (76%; all ps < 0.001), followed by searching journals and textbook including the online versions (62%; all ps < 0.001). Overall, 6% of the respondents reported no time/interest for CME during the pandemic. Although most urologists report using only one platform for their CME (26.6%), the majority reported using ≥ 2 platforms, with approximately 10% of the respondents using up to 5 different platforms. Urologists < 40 years old were more likely to use online literature (69%), podcasts/AV media (38%), online CME courses/webinars (40%), and social media (39%). There were regional variations in the CME modality used but no significant difference in the number of methods by region. There was no significant difference in responses between urologists in academic/public hospitals or private practice.
conclusionDuring COVID-19, urologists have used web-based learning for their CME. Internet learning and literature were the top frequently cited learning methods. Younger urologists are more likely to use all forms of digital learning methods, while older urologists prefer fewer methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.