Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860403›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Drivers of stunting reduction in Peru: a country case study.

Luis Huicho, Elisa Vidal-Cárdenas, Nadia Akseer, Samanpreet Brar, Kaitlin Conway, Muhammad Islam, Elisa Juarez, Aviva Rappaport, Hana Tasic, Tyler Vaivada and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luis HuichoResearch Center for Integral and Sustainable Development, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Elisa Vidal-CárdenasResearch Center for Integral and Sustainable Development, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima, Peru.
Nadia AkseerCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Samanpreet BrarCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kaitlin ConwayCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Muhammad IslamCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elisa JuarezCenter for the Promotion and Defense of Sexual and Reproductive Rights (PROMSEX), Lima, Peru.
Aviva RappaportCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hana TasicCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tyler VaivadaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jannah WigleCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeru reduced its under-5 child stunting prevalence notably from 31.3% in 2000 to 13.1% in 2016.

objectivesWe aimed to study factors and key enablers of child stunting reduction in Peru from 2000-2016.

methodsDemographic and Health Surveys were used to conduct descriptive analyses [height-for-age z scores (HAZ) means and distributions, equity analysis, predicted child growth curves through polynomial regressions] and advanced regression analyses. An ecological (at department level) multilevel regression analysis was conducted to identify the major predictors of stunting decline from 2000 to 2016, and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition was conducted to identify the relative contribution of each factor to child HAZ change. A systematic literature review, policy and program analysis, and interviews with relevant stakeholders were conducted to understand key drivers of stunting decline in Peru.

resultsThe distribution of HAZ scores showed a slight rightward shift from 2000 to 2007/2008, and a greater shift from 2007/2008 to 2016. Stunting reduction was higher in the lowest wealth quintile, in rural areas, and among children with the least educated mothers. Decomposing predicted changes showed that the most important factors were increased maternal BMI and maternal height, improved maternal and newborn health care, increased parental education, migration to urban areas, and reduced fertility. Key drivers included the advocacy role of civil society and political leadership around poverty and stunting reduction since the early 2000s. Key enablers included the economic growth and the consolidation of democracy since the early 2000s, and the acknowledgement that stunting reduction needs much more than food supplementation.

conclusionsPeru reduced child stunting owing to improved socioeconomic determinants, sustained implementation of out-of-health-sector and within-health-sector changes, and implementation of health interventions. These efforts were driven through a multisectoral approach, strong civil society advocacy, and keen political leadership. Peru's experience offers useful lessons on how to tackle the problem of stunting under differing scenarios, with the participation of multiple sectors.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild, PreschoolEducational StatusFemaleGrowth DisordersHumansInfantMalePeruPovertyPrevalenceRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationchildrenexemplarLatin Americalinear growthmixed methodsnutritionPerustunting

Identifiers

PMID32860403
PMCPMC7487430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.