Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860398›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Morning diurnal preference and food intake: a Mendelian randomization study.

Hassan S Dashti, Angela Chen, Iyas Daghlas, Richa Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hassan S DashtiCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Angela ChenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Iyas DaghlasCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Richa SaxenaCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Genetics of chronotype and impact on metabolic diseaseR01DK107859 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Richa Saxena · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
Impact of Malatonin, Food Timing and Receptor Variant on Type 2 Diabetes RiskR01DK105072 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAXENA, RICHA, SCHEER, FRANK A · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105072NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK107859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor dietary choices may underlie known associations between having an evening diurnal preference and cardiometabolic diseases. Assessing causal links between diurnal preference and food intake is now possible in Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.

objectivesWe aimed to use a 2-sample MR to determine potential causal effects of genetic liability to a morning preference on food intake. We also examined potential causal effects of a morning preference on objectively captured response performances to email-administered 24-h diet recalls.

methodsWe used genetic variants associated with a morning preference from a published genome-wide association meta-analysis. Our outcomes included 61 food items with estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire in the UK Biobank (n = 361,194). For significant findings, we repeated the analysis using intake estimates from modified 24-h diet recalls in a subset of overlapping participants (n = 146,086). In addition, we examined 7 response performance outcomes, including the time and duration of responses to 24-h diet recalls (n = 123,035). MR effects were estimated using an inverse-variance weighted analysis.

resultsGenetic liability to a morning preference was associated with increased intake of 6 food items (fresh fruit, alcohol with meals, bran cereal, cereals, dried fruit, and water), decreased intake of 4 food items (beer plus cider, processed meat, other cereals [e.g., corn or frosted flakes], and full cream milk), increased temperature of hot drinks, and decreased variation in diet (PFalse Discovery Rate < 0.05). There was no evidence for an effect on coffee or tea intake. Findings for fresh fruit, beer plus cider, bran cereal, and cereal were consistent when intakes were estimated by 24-h diet recalls (P < 0.05). We also identified potential causal links between a morning preference with earlier timing and a shorter duration for completing email-administered 24-h diet recalls.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence for a potentially causal effect of a morning preference with the increased intake of foods known to constitute a healthy diet, suggesting possible health benefits of adopting a more morning diurnal preference.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisAdultCircadian RhythmDietDiet RecordsEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalechronobiologydiurnal preferencefood intakeMendelian randomizationUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID32860398
PMCPMC7657324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.