Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860149›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020

The effects of incidental findings from whole-body MRI on the frequency of biopsies and detected malignancies or benign conditions in a general population cohort study.

Adrian Richter, Elizabeth Sierocinski, Stephan Singer, Robin Bülow, Carolin Hackmann, Jean-François Chenot, Carsten Oliver Schmidt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Returning Incidental Research Findings FromArthritis care & research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "Incidentalomas" in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  13. Assessing new screening tests: Panacea or profligate?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cancer screening.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian RichterDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, Greifswald University Medical Center, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. adrian.richter@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-2021
Elizabeth SierocinskiDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, Greifswald University Medical Center, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Stephan SingerInstitute for Pathology, Greifswald University Medical Center, Friedrich-Loeffler-Str. 23e, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Robin BülowDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Greifswald University Medical Center Greifswald, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Carolin HackmannDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, Greifswald University Medical Center, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Jean-François ChenotDepartment of Family Medicine, Institute for Community Medicine, Fleischmannstr. 42, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Carsten Oliver SchmidtDepartment SHIP-KEF, Institute for Community Medicine, Greifswald University Medical Center, Walther Rathenau Str. 48, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CH 921/1-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHM 2744/1-2:1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yields numerous tumor-related incidental findings (IFs) which may trigger diagnostics such as biopsies. To clarify these effects, we studied how whole-body MRI IF disclosure in a population-based cohort affected biopsy frequency and the detection of malignancies. Laboratory disclosures were also assessed. Data from 6753 participants in the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) examined between 2008 and 2012 were utilized. All underwent laboratory examinations and 3371 (49.9%) a whole-body MRI. Electronic biopsy reports from 2002 to 2017 were linked to participants and assigned to outcome categories. Biopsy frequency 2 years pre- and post-SHIP was investigated using generalized estimating equations with a negative-binomial distribution. Overall 8208 IFs (laboratory findings outside reference limits: 6839; MRI: 1369) were disclosed to 4707 participants; 2271 biopsy reports belonged to 1200 participants (17.8%). Of these, 938 biopsies occurred pre-SHIP; 1333 post-SHIP (event rate/100 observation years = 6.9 [95% CI 6.5; 7.4]; 9.9 [9.3; 10.4]). Age, cancer history, recent hospitalization, female sex, and IF disclosure were associated with higher biopsy rates. Nonmalignant biopsy results increased more in participants with disclosures (post-/pre-SHIP rate ratio 1.39 [95% CI 1.22; 1.58]) than without (1.09 [95% CI 0.85; 1.38]). Malignant biopsy results were more frequent post-SHIP (rate ratio 1.74 [95% CI 1.27; 2.42]). Biopsies increased after participation in a population-based cohort study with MRI and laboratory IF disclosure. Most biopsies resulted in no findings and few malignancies were diagnosed, indicating potential overtesting and overdiagnosis. A more restrictive policy regarding IF disclosure from research findings is required.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsAdultAgedBiopsyCohort StudiesDisclosureFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMedical Record LinkageMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityWhole Body ImagingBiopsiesHistological examinationsIncidental findingsMagnetic resonance imagingRecord linkage

Identifiers

PMID32860149
PMCPMC7524843
OpenAlexW3081801129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.