ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020
The effects of incidental findings from whole-body MRI on the frequency of biopsies and detected malignancies or benign conditions in a general population cohort study.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-body MRI for opportunistic cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging-based texture analysis in differentiating enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.Skeletal radiology · 2023Trial
- Whole-body MRI, healthcare ethics and access equity: Where are we? Where are we going?Radiology advances · 2026Article
- ONCO-RADS-guided Large Language Models for Extraction and Classification of Incidental Findings on Whole-Body Imaging Reports.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Social Media Posts About Medical Tests With Potential for Overdiagnosis.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Returning Incidental Research Findings FromArthritis care & research · 2024Article
- WFUMB Review Paper. Incidental Findings in Otherwise Healthy Subjects, How to Manage: Liver.Cancers · 2024Review
- Social Media Promotion of Health Tests With Potential for Overdiagnosis or Overuse: Protocol for a Content Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Chronic disease outcome metadata from German observational studies - public availability and FAIR principles.Scientific data · 2023Article
- "Incidentalomas" in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Regression Modeling for Recurrent Events Possibly with an Informative Terminal Event Using R Package reReg.Journal of statistical software · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessing new screening tests: Panacea or profligate?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Reporting of Incidental Findings in a Population-Based Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Observational
- SHIP-MR and Radiology: 12 Years of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Single Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cancer screening.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yields numerous tumor-related incidental findings (IFs) which may trigger diagnostics such as biopsies. To clarify these effects, we studied how whole-body MRI IF disclosure in a population-based cohort affected biopsy frequency and the detection of malignancies. Laboratory disclosures were also assessed. Data from 6753 participants in the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) examined between 2008 and 2012 were utilized. All underwent laboratory examinations and 3371 (49.9%) a whole-body MRI. Electronic biopsy reports from 2002 to 2017 were linked to participants and assigned to outcome categories. Biopsy frequency 2 years pre- and post-SHIP was investigated using generalized estimating equations with a negative-binomial distribution. Overall 8208 IFs (laboratory findings outside reference limits: 6839; MRI: 1369) were disclosed to 4707 participants; 2271 biopsy reports belonged to 1200 participants (17.8%). Of these, 938 biopsies occurred pre-SHIP; 1333 post-SHIP (event rate/100 observation years = 6.9 [95% CI 6.5; 7.4]; 9.9 [9.3; 10.4]). Age, cancer history, recent hospitalization, female sex, and IF disclosure were associated with higher biopsy rates. Nonmalignant biopsy results increased more in participants with disclosures (post-/pre-SHIP rate ratio 1.39 [95% CI 1.22; 1.58]) than without (1.09 [95% CI 0.85; 1.38]). Malignant biopsy results were more frequent post-SHIP (rate ratio 1.74 [95% CI 1.27; 2.42]). Biopsies increased after participation in a population-based cohort study with MRI and laboratory IF disclosure. Most biopsies resulted in no findings and few malignancies were diagnosed, indicating potential overtesting and overdiagnosis. A more restrictive policy regarding IF disclosure from research findings is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.