Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860122›Full record

Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Feature tracking and mapping analysis of myocardial response to improved perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina treated by coronary sinus Reducer implantation: a CMR study.

Anna Palmisano, Francesco Giannini, Paola Rancoita, Guglielmo Gallone, Giulia Benedetti, Luca Baldetti, Georgios Tzanis, Davide Vignale, Caterina Monti, Francesco Ponticelli and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Device-Based Therapies for Refractory Angina.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna PalmisanoExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Francesco GianniniUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paola RancoitaDepartment University Centre for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences (CUSSB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Guglielmo GalloneUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giulia BenedettiExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Luca BaldettiUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Georgios TzanisUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Davide VignaleExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Caterina MontiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PonticelliInterventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
Marco AnconaUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo MontorfanoUnit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro Del MaschioExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Antonio ColomboInterventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy.
Antonio EspositoExperimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. esposito.antonio@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-6266
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMaria Cecilia Hospital · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation improves myocardial perfusion and symptoms in patients with debilitating refractory angina. Its impact on myocardial remodeling remain uncertain. Aim of the present study was to assess possible impact of CS Reducer on myocardial systolic-diastolic deformation and microstructural remodeling, as assessed through cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and mapping analysis. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with refractory angina underwent multiparametric stress CMR before and 4 months after CS Reducer implantation. Eight patients were excluded (6 for absence of inducible ischemia, 2 for artifacts). Modifications in 3D systo-diastolic myocardial deformation were evaluated using feature tracking analysis on rest cine images. Myocardial microstructural remodeling was assessed by native T1 mapping, cellular and matrix volume and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). Collaterally, the percentage of ischemic myocardium (ischemic burden %) and the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) were measured. After CS Reducer implantation, myocardial contractility improved (ejection fraction rose from 61 to 67%; p = 0.0079), along with longitudinal (from - 16 to - 19%; p = 0.0192) and circumferential strain (from - 18 to - 21%; p = 0.0017). Peak diastolic radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain rate did not change (p > 0.05), and no changes in native T1, ECV, cellular and matrix volume were observed. Myocardial perfusion improved, with a reduction of ischemic burden (13-11%; p = 0.0135), and recovery of intramural perfusion balance in segments with baseline ischemia (MPRi endocardial/epicardial ratio from 0.67 to 0.96; p = 0.0107). CS Reducer improves myocardial longitudinal and circumferential strain, without microstructural remodeling and no impact on diastolic proprieties.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial Perfusion ImagingAgedAngina PectorisCardiac CatheterizationCoronary SinusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftCardiac magnetic resonanceECVReducerRefractory anginaStress imagingT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID32860122
OpenAlexW3082975627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.