Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860117›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2020

The effect of breaking up prolonged sitting on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity.

E Bojsen-Møller, M M Ekblom, O Tarassova, D W Dunstan, O Ekblom

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sedentary behavior and lifespan brain health.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E Bojsen-MøllerThe Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden. emil.bojsen.moller@gih.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3805-2861
M M EkblomThe Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden.
O TarassovaThe Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden.
D W DunstanBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
O EkblomThe Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, 11486, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SESwedish School of Sport and Health Sciences · SEBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AU

Funding

Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling 20160040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) can induce plasticity in the motor cortex, as measured by changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE). This effect is attenuated in older and less active individuals. Although a single bout of exercise enhances PAS-induced plasticity in young, physically inactive adults, it is not yet known if physical activity interventions affect PAS-induced neuroplasticity in middle-aged inactive individuals. Sixteen inactive middle-aged office workers participated in a randomized cross-over design investigating how CSE and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) were affected by PAS preceded by 3 h of sitting (SIT), 3 h of sitting interrupted every 30 min by 3 min of frequent short bouts of physical activity (FPA) and 2.5 h of sitting followed by 25 min of moderate-intensity exercise (EXE). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the dominant abductor pollicis brevis to induce recruitment curves before and 5 min and 30 min post-PAS. Linear mixed models were used to compare changes in CSE using time and condition as fixed effects and subjects as random effects. There was a main effect of time on CSE and planned within-condition comparisons showed that CSE was significantly increased from baseline to 5 min and 30 min post-PAS, in the FPA condition, with no significant changes in the SIT or EXE conditions. SICI decreased from baseline to 5 min post-PAS, but this was not related to changes in CSE. Our findings suggest that in middle-aged inactive adults, FPAs may promote corticospinal neuroplasticity. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityAdultAgedElectric StimulationHumansMiddle AgedTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCorticospinal excitabilityPaired associative stimulationSedentary behaviourTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32860117
PMCPMC7541377
OpenAlexW3081971662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.