Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860091›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rod on positive blood cultures using MicroScan panels.

A Infante, V Ortiz de la Tabla, C Martín, G Gázquez, F Buñuel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of a sterile, filter-based, in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using positive blood culture.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A InfanteServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. anaiu@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6526-1728
V Ortiz de la TablaServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-4236
C MartínServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-9203
G GázquezServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-8924
F BuñuelServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-5693
Hospital Universitari Sant Joan D'Alacant · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortening the turnaround time of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria permits a significant reduction of patient morbidity, mortality, and cost. Conventional blood culture methods are the gold standard diagnostic test to guide management of patient with sepsis, but the conventional process requires at least 12 to 24 h after the blood culture has been flagged as positive due to requirement for pure colonies. We describe a simple and inexpensive method to obtain faster AST with MicroScan system (Beckman Coulter) directly from positive blood cultures. Conventional and direct identification and AST were performed simultaneously by both methods in 1070 blood cultures, and 9106 MICs were determinated. About 96.5% were correctly identified with the direct method. Overall, categorical agreement was 92.86%. We found 46 very major errors, but globally the results showed a good correlation with the standard method, particularly favorable for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, except amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam. For P. mirabilis, betalactams antibiotics (except second- and third-generation cephalosporines) showed a good correlation, and also a good correlation was found for ciprofloxacine and gentamicine in P. aeruginosa and amoxicillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacine, gentamicine, and cotrimoxazole in E. cloacae. This method has the main advantage of providing reliable results 1 day earlier, being a simple, fast, and cheap method for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from positive blood cultures.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureEscherichia coliGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPoint-of-Care TestingReproducibility of ResultsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibility testingDirectly from blood culturesGram-negative rods

Identifiers

PMID32860091
OpenAlexW3082727538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.