Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860076›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2021

Diversity and Ecology of Chlorophyta (Viridiplantae) Assemblages in Protected and Non-protected Sites in Deception Island (Antarctica, South Shetland Islands) Assessed Using an NGS Approach.

Paulo Eduardo Aguiar Saraiva Câmara, Micheline Carvalho-Silva, Otávio H B Pinto, Eduardo T Amorim, Diego Knop Henriques, Thamar Holanda da Silva, Franciane Pellizzari, Peter Convey, Luiz Henrique Rosa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo Eduardo Aguiar Saraiva CâmaraDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil. pcamara@unb.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-996X
Micheline Carvalho-SilvaDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-3804
Otávio H B PintoDepartamento de Biologia Celular e Molecular, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-2987
Eduardo T AmorimDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1339
Diego Knop HenriquesDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2839-8877
Thamar Holanda da SilvaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-3354
Franciane PellizzariDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual do Paraná, Paranaguá, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1877-2570
Peter ConveyBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-9903
Luiz Henrique RosaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-5182
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRBritish Antarctic Survey · GBUniversidade Estadual do Paraná · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 23/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of the diversity of algal assemblages in Antarctica has until now largely relied on traditional microbiological culture approaches. Here we used DNA metabarcoding through high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to assess the uncultured algal diversity at two sites on Deception Island, Antarctica. The first was a relatively undisturbed site within an Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA 140), and the second was a site heavily impacted by human visitation, the Whalers Bay historic site. We detected 65 distinct algal taxa, 50 from within ASPA 140 and 61 from Whalers Bay. Of these taxa, 46 were common to both sites, and 19 only occurred at one site. Algal richness was about six times greater than reported in previous studies using culture methods. A high proportion of DNA reads obtained was assigned to the highly invasive species Caulerpa webbiana at Whalers Bay, and the potentially pathogenic genus Desmodesmus was found at both sites. Our data demonstrate that important differences exist between these two protected and human-impacted sites on Deception Island in terms of algal diversity, richness, and abundance. The South Shetland Islands have experienced considerable effects of climate change in recent decades, while warming through geothermal activity on Deception Island itself makes this island one of the most vulnerable to colonization by non-native species. The detection of DNA of non-native taxa highlights concerns about how human impacts, which take place primarily through tourism and national research operations, may influence future biological colonization processes in Antarctica.

Indexed as

BiodiversityIslandsAntarctic RegionsChlorophytaEcosystemGeographyHumansIntroduced SpeciesSoil MicrobiologyAntarcticaGreen algaeHigh-throughput sequencingSouth Shetland Islands

Identifiers

PMID32860076
OpenAlexW3082215818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.