Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32860038›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

Concerns About the Special Article on Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in High-Risk Outpatients With COVID-19.

Matthew P Fox, Lucy D'Agostino McGowan, Bryan D James, Justin Lessler, Shruti H Mehta, Eleanor J Murray

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew P Fox
Lucy D'Agostino McGowan
Bryan D James
Justin Lessler
Shruti H Mehta
Eleanor J Murray
Boston University · US

Funding

Cognitive decline after hospitalization in older adults: predictors and pathogenesisK01AG050823 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JAMES, BRYAN DAVID · 2015 to 2019
$580k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG050823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In May 2020, the Journal published an opinion piece by a member of the Editorial Board, in which the author reviewed several papers and argued that using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin (AZ) early to treat symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in high-risk patients should be broadly applied. As members of the Journal's Editorial Board, we are strongly supportive of open debate in science, which is essential even on highly contentious issues. However, we must also be thorough in our examination of the facts and open to changing our minds when new information arises. In this commentary, we document several important errors in the manuscript, review the literature presented, and demonstrate why it is not of sufficient quality to support scale up of HCQ + AZ, and then discuss the literature that has been generated since the publication, which also does not support use of this therapy. Unfortunately, the current scientific evidence does not support HCQ + AZ as an effective treatment for COVID-19, if it ever did, and even suggests many risks. Continuing to push the view that it is an essential treatment in the face of this evidence is irresponsible and harmful to the many people already suffering from infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHydroxychloroquineAzithromycinHumansOutpatientsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAzithromycinHydroxychloroquineazithromycinbiasconfoundinghydroxychloroquineobservational studiesrandomized trials

Identifiers

PMID32860038
PMCPMC7499476
OpenAlexW3081412924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.