ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2020
Environmental and economic impact of using increased fresh gas flow to reduce carbon dioxide absorbent consumption in the absence of inhalational anaesthetics.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness of a transition from volatile anaesthesia to total intravenous anaesthesia to reduce carbon footprint: an economic modelling study.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- The effects of warmed carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum nursing care on core body temperature, acid-base balance, and lymphocytes in older patients with cancer in Korea: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2025Article
- Assessment of bacterial positivity rate changes in anesthesia machine internal circuits within recovery rooms and associated risk factors.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- Life cycle assessment of memsorb use.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
- Rationing oxygen use during total intravenous anaesthesia: a proportionate response?British journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
- High fresh gas flow during non-inhalational anaesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 773-778.British journal of anaesthesia · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing fresh gas flow (FGF) to a circle breathing system reduces carbon dioxide (CO
methodsA test lung with fixed CO
resultsIncreasing FGF from 1 to 6 L min
conclusionsIn the absence of inhalational anaesthetic agents, increasing FGF to 6 L min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.