Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859332›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition ESPEN2020

Easy-to-prescribe nutrition support in the intensive care in the era of COVID-19.

Aude de Watteville, Laurence Genton, Gleicy Keli Barcelos, Jérôme Pugin, Claude Pichard, Claudia Paula Heidegger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Aude de WattevilleNutrition Unit, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Division of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Laurence GentonNutrition Unit, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Gleicy Keli BarcelosDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Jérôme PuginDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Claude PichardNutrition Unit, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Claudia Paula HeideggerDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland. Electronic address: claudia.heidegger@hcuge.ch.
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsCOVID-19 pandemic had resulted in a massive increase in the number of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This created significant organizational challenges including numerous non-specialist ICU caregivers who came to work in the ICU. In this context, pragmatic protocols were essential to simplify nutritional care. We aimed at providing a simple and easy-to-prescribe nutritional protocol and evaluated its usefulness with questionnaires sent to physicians involved in the care of ICU COVID-19 patients.

methodsA simplified nutrition protocol was distributed to all physicians (n = 122) of the ICU medical team during COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical dieticians estimated energy targets for acute and post-acute phases at patient's admission and suggested adaptations of nutrition therapy. More complex situations were discussed with clinical nutrition doctors and, if required, a clinical evaluation was performed. To further facilitate the procedure, a chart with prescription aids was also distributed to the whole medical ICU team. At the end of the current pandemic wave, a 13-item questionnaire was emailed to the ICU medical team to obtain their opinion on the suggested nutritional therapy.

resultsAnswers were received from 81/122 medical doctors (MDs) (66% response rate), from intensive care physicians (41%), anaesthesiologists (53%) and MDs from other specialties (6%). Thirty-two percent of MDs felt that their knowledge of nutrition management was insufficient and 45% of the physicians surveyed did not face nutrition management in their daily practice prior to the pandemic. The initially proposed nutritional protocol, the chart with prescription aids and the suggested nutritional proposals were considered as useful to very useful by the majority of physicians surveyed (89.9, 90.7 and 92.1% respectively). The protocol was followed by 92% of MDs, and almost all participants (95%) were convinced that adaptations of nutritional therapy had beneficial effects on patients' outcomes.

conclusionsNutritional therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients is a challenge and the implementation of this specific pandemic simplified nutritional protocol was assessed as useful by a great majority of physicians. Pragmatic and simplified protocols are useful for ensuring the quality of nutritional therapy and could be used in future studies to assess its actual impact on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleNutritional SupportPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPrescriptionsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Critical illnessICUNutrition therapyPandemicQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID32859332
PMCPMC7837278
OpenAlexW3046446167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.