Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859281›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2020

Effects on Mouse Food Consumption After Exposure to Bedding from Sick Mice or Healthy Mice.

Rebecca M Lovasz, Daniel L Marks, Benjamin K Chan, Kim E Saunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca M LovaszDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon;, Email: lovasz@ohsu.edu.
Daniel L MarksPapé Family Pediatric Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Benjamin K ChanBiostatistics and Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Kim E SaundersDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Exosomes as Endocrine Signaling Molecules in Cancer CachexiaR01CA217989 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MARKS, DANIEL L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
(PQD6) Hypothalamic Inflammation in the Initiation of CachexiaR01CA184324 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MARKS, DANIEL L. · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184324NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control mice housed in the same room as mice with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrate decreased food intake coincident with the cachexia experienced by the mice with PDAC. Mice are considered an empathetic species, and we hypothesized that the reduced food intake in normal mice was an "empathy state" that was mediated by olfactory cues. Naïve male and female C57BL/6 mice were exposed to soiled bedding from mice experiencing PDAC induced cachexia or from control mice in the PDAC study. Body weight, food intake, and food spillage were measured across 48 h. Statistically significant differences in food consumption were found at various time points in both positive and negative directions for the 2 bedding conditions, and the direction of effect was opposite for males and females. Although analysis of data from previous PDAC studies showed differences in food spillage between PDAC mice and their controls, in this study we found no correlation between food consumption and food spillage based on bedding type. Disruption of food intake due to the "empathy state" requires testing larger numbers of animals to attain appropriate statistical power, which is contrary to the goal of using fewer animals. Empathy effects require careful consideration of sample size and cautious interpretation of results. This study also highlights the importance of sex as a biologic variable and why quantifying food spillage is important in studies of food intake.

Indexed as

EatingHousing, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsBody WeightCachexiaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCuesFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSex CharacteristicsSmell

Identifiers

PMID32859281
PMCPMC7604684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.