Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859225›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2020

Examining the effect of the individual characteristics of implementers and the interaction of multiple relationships on the structure of psychosocial intervention teams.

Ignacio Ramos-Vidal, Jorge Palacio, Ilse Villamil, Alicia Uribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Leadership perspectives on facilitators and barriers to sustaining evidence-based prevention interventions in the United States Military.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Structural Cohesion, Role Equivalence, or Homophily: Which Process Best Explains Social Homogeneity?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ignacio Ramos-VidalDepartment of Social Psychology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain. iramos5@us.es.ORCID 0000-0002-1840-0761
Jorge PalacioFaculty of Psychology, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6971-7067
Ilse VillamilResearch Group CAVIDA, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Montería, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7991-6481
Alicia UribeResearch Group CAVIDA, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Montería, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1244-8908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeams' structure may undergo modifications due to the individual attributes of actors and collective-level variables. This research aims to understand the effect of extensive experience working in the program and the simultaneous interaction among different relationships in the network structure of a team of implementers. The Psychosocial Care Program for Victims of Conflict is implemented by psychologists, social workers, and community advocates.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out. Multivariate analysis, quadratic assignment procedures, and graphic visualization are used to (a) determine how seniority affects the professionals' level of centrality in the program and (b) clarify how the interaction among professionals favors new relationships.

resultsLonger-lasting professionals in the program report stronger network bonding, predisposition to work, and information exchange. The nonparametric permutation test indicates an intense association between the information requests submitted and received and between the predisposition to work network and the network of received information requests. The results are discussed to optimize the teams implementing the intervention programs.

conclusionsNetwork analysis is a powerfull tool to evaluate program implementation processes. Analyzing the interactions among multiples relationships that emerge between members of multidisciplinary teams allows knowing how certain relationships (e.g., information exchange) triggering other kind of relationships (e.g., users referral). The implementers who have been collaborating in the program for a long time are key informants who can facilitate the process of adaptation of newly incorporated professionals.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPsychosocial InterventionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImplementationInformation exchangeMental healthNetwork analysisPsychosocial interventionWar victims

Identifiers

PMID32859225
PMCPMC7456066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.