Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859210›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Attrition, physical integrity and insecticidal activity of long-lasting insecticidal nets in sub-Saharan Africa and modelling of their impact on vectorial capacity.

Olivier Briet, Hannah Koenker, Laura Norris, Ryan Wiegand, Jodi Vanden Eng, Alex Thackeray, John Williamson, John E Gimnig, Filomeno Fortes, Martin Akogbeto and 25 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Durability study of VeeralinParasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Olivier BrietSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
Hannah KoenkerPMI VectorWorks, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura NorrisU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Ryan WiegandDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jodi Vanden EngDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alex ThackerayPMI VectorWorks, Denver, CO, USA.
John WilliamsonDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
John E GimnigDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-447X
Filomeno FortesNational Malaria Control Program (NMCP), Ministry of Health, Luanda, Angola.
Martin AkogbetoCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Anges W YadouletonCentre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (CREC), Cotonou, Bénin.
Maurice OmbokKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
M Nabie BayohKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kisumu, Kenya.
Themba MzilahowaCollege of Medicine, Malaria Alert Centre, P/Bag 360, Blantyre 3, Malawi.
Ana Paula AbílioInstituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Samuel MabundaInstituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nelson CuambaInstituto Nacional de Saúde (INS), Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Elhadji DioufFaculté des Sciences et Techniques (FST), Université Cheikh Anta Diop (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal.
Lassana KonatéFaculté des Sciences et Techniques (FST), Université Cheikh Anta Diop (UCAD), Dakar, Senegal.
Busiku HamainzaNational Malaria Control Centre (NMCC), Lusaka, Zambia.
Cecilia Katebe-SakalaNational Malaria Control Centre (NMCC), Lusaka, Zambia.
Gabriel Ponce de LeónDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kwame AsamoaDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Adam WolkonDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen C SmithDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Isabel SwamidossDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mike GreenDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Salam GueyeDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jules MihigoDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Juliette MorganU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ellen DotsonDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allen S CraigU.S. President's Malaria Initiative, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kathrine R TanDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert A WirtzDivision of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tom SmithSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. Thomas-A.Smith@unibas.ch.
Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria · USInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZCheikh Anta Diop University · SNKenya Medical Research Institute · KENational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZMSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · USGates Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · AOProgamme National Contre le Tuberculose · BJVector (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the primary malaria prevention and control intervention in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. While LLINs are expected to last at least 3 years under normal use conditions, they can lose effectiveness because they fall out of use, are discarded, repurposed, physically damaged, or lose insecticidal activity. The contributions of these different interrelated factors to durability of nets and their protection against malaria have been unclear.

methodsStarting in 2009, LLIN durability studies were conducted in seven countries in Africa over 5 years. WHO-recommended measures of attrition, LLIN use, insecticidal activity, and physical integrity were recorded for eight different net brands. These data were combined with analyses of experimental hut data on feeding inhibition and killing effects of LLINs on both susceptible and pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors to estimate the protection against malaria transmission-in terms of vectorial capacity (VC)-provided by each net cohort over time. Impact on VC was then compared in hypothetical scenarios where one durability outcome measure was set at the best possible level while keeping the others at the observed levels.

resultsThere was more variability in decay of protection over time by country than by net brand for three measures of durability (ratios of variance components 4.6, 4.4, and 1.8 times for LLIN survival, use, and integrity, respectively). In some countries, LLIN attrition was slow, but use declined rapidly. Non-use of LLINs generally had more effect on LLIN impact on VC than did attrition, hole formation, or insecticide loss.

conclusionsThere is much more variation in LLIN durability among countries than among net brands. Low levels of use may have a larger impact on effectiveness than does variation in attrition or LLIN degradation. The estimated entomological effects of chemical decay are relatively small, with physical decay probably more important as a driver of attrition and non-use than as a direct cause of loss of effect. Efforts to maximize LLIN impact in operational settings should focus on increasing LLIN usage, including through improvements in LLIN physical integrity. Further research is needed to understand household decisions related to LLIN use, including the influence of net durability and the presence of other nets in the household.

Indexed as

InsecticidesMosquito VectorsAngolaBeninGambiaInsecticide-Treated BednetsKenyaMalariaMalawiModels, TheoreticalMosquito ControlMozambiqueSenegalInsecticidesDurability monitoringLong-lasting insecticidal netsMalariaVectorial capacity

Identifiers

PMID32859210
PMCPMC7456088
OpenAlexW3081715054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.