Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859178›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2020

Efficacy of HIV interventions among factory workers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Dahui Chen, Ganfeng Luo, Xiaojun Meng, Zixin Wang, Bolin Cao, Tanwei Yuan, Yu Xie, Tian Hu, Yaqi Chen, Wujian Ke and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dahui ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Ganfeng LuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Xiaojun MengWuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR China.
Zixin WangCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China.
Bolin CaoSchool of Media and Communication, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Tanwei YuanSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Yu XieSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Tian HuLonghua District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Yaqi ChenLonghua District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Wujian KeDermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Zhenyu WangSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Caijun SunSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Kai DengZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Yong CaiDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China. caiyong202028@163.com.
Kechun ZhangLonghua District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China. 398081363@qq.com.
Huachun ZouSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China. zouhuachun@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-7576
Sun Yat-sen University · CNShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShenzhen University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship APP1092621High Level Project of Medicine in Longhua, ShenZhen, China HLPM201907020105National Natural Science Foundation of China 81703278, 7191101234Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM201811071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactory workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are vulnerable to HIV transmission. Interventions are needed to prevent HIV in this population. We systematically reviewed published literature on the efficacy of various HIV interventions in reducing stigma, risk behaviors and HIV transmission among factory workers.

methodsA systematic review was performed using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and EMBASE) were searched for relevant publications between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2018. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of studies.

resultsThirteen articles were included, with 2 randomized controlled trials and 11 cohort studies. Five interventions and their combinations were summarized. Educational intervention increased condom use and reduced the use of recreational drugs and alcohol before sex. Community intervention that proactively provide HIV counselling and testing (HCT) services could increase the detection rate of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Lottery intervention increased HCT uptake and decreased HIV public stigma. Education combined with community intervention reduced the proportion of workers with casual sex and enhanced HIV knowledge. Peer education combined with community intervention increased the proportion of workers who were willing to take their partners to HCT. Policy intervention combined with peer education enhanced HIV knowledge, perceived condom accessibility and condom use with regular partners.

conclusionsVarious interventions improved HIV knowledge, decreased HIV stigma and reduced HIV-related risk behaviors among factory workers in LMICs. The combination of multiple interventions tended to achieve better efficacy than a single intervention. Persistent combination interventions are essential to address HIV in this population.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesManufacturing and Industrial FacilitiesOccupational HealthCohort StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFactory workersHIVHIV-related risk behaviorsInterventionsLow- and middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID32859178
PMCPMC7455896
OpenAlexW3081729619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.