Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32859048›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

High Prevalence of Supplement Intake with a Concomitant Low Information Quality among Swiss Fitness Center Users.

Samuel Mettler, Joëlle Vera Bosshard, Dino Häring, Gareth Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aspects Regarding the Consumption of Dietary Supplements among the Active Population in Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel MettlerDepartment of Health, Bern University of Applied Sciences, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Joëlle Vera BosshardDepartment of Health, Bern University of Applied Sciences, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Dino HäringDepartment of Health, Bern University of Applied Sciences, 3008 Bern, Switzerland.
Gareth MorganDepartment of Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Office of Sport, 2532 Magglingen, Switzerland.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHSwiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen SFISM · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to screen the prevalence of supplement use in Swiss fitness center users and what information sources they consulted.

methodsCustomers of 10 fitness centers were screened with a quantitative questionnaire.

resultsEighty two percent of the 417 fitness center users consumed at least one supplement per week. Supplement intake correlated with training frequency (rs = 0.253,

conclusionsA high prevalence of supplement intake among Swiss fitness center users was associated with a low level of information quality and a low prevalence of risk information. A discrepancy between a desire for high quality evidence-based information and a contrasting behavior was detected.

Indexed as

Fitness CentersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Risk BehaviorsAdolescentAdultConsumer BehaviorDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional RequirementsPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandYoung Adultconsumer behaviorexercisefitness athletesinformation sourcerisk behaviorrisk perceptionsupplements

Identifiers

PMID32859048
PMCPMC7550988
OpenAlexW3081252315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.