Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32858967›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Retrospective Exposure Assessment Methods Used in Occupational Human Health Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Francesca Borghi, Libero Andrea Mazzucchelli, Davide Campagnolo, Sabrina Rovelli, Giacomo Fanti, Marta Keller, Andrea Cattaneo, Andrea Spinazzè, Domenico Maria Cavallo

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perinatal lead (Pb) exposure and alterations to amyloid beta and metabolic profiles in the brain.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca BorghiDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-2803
Libero Andrea MazzucchelliDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.
Davide CampagnoloDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-6106
Sabrina RovelliDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-5101
Giacomo FantiDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3728-839X
Marta KellerDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-7964
Andrea CattaneoDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-7259
Andrea SpinazzèDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-3164
Domenico Maria CavalloDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.
University of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of the assessment and management of chemical risk and occupational hygiene, retrospective exposure assessment (REA) to chemical agents can be defined as the estimate of exposure associated with a person's work history. The fundamental problem underlying the reconstruction of the exposure is that of transforming this type of information in quantitative terms to obtain an accurate estimate. REA can follow various approaches, some of which are technically complicated and both time and resource consuming. The aim of this systematic review is to present the techniques mainly used for occupational REA. In order to carry out this evaluation, a systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted. Forty-four studies were identified (published from 2010 to date) and analyzed. In exposure reconstruction studies, quantitative approaches should be preferable, especially when estimates will be used in the context of health impact assessment or epidemiology, although it is important to stress how, ideally, the experimental data available for the considered scenario should be used whenever possible as the main starting information base for further processing. To date, there is no single approach capable of providing an accurate estimate of exposure for each reasonably foreseeable condition and situation and the best approach generally depends on the level of information available for the specific case. The use of a combination of different reconstruction techniques can, therefore, represent a powerful tool for weighting and integrating data obtained through qualitative and quantitative approaches, in order to obtain the best possible estimate.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAsbestosEnvironmental MonitoringHumansInhalation ExposureOccupational ExposureProhibitinsRisk AssessmentAsbestosPHB2 protein, humanProhibitinsasbestosexposure assessmentJEMjob-exposure matrixoccupational exposurepast exposureREAretrospective exposure assessment

Identifiers

PMID32858967
PMCPMC7504303
OpenAlexW3081441909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.