Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32858923›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Effects of Point-Of-Care Testing in General Practice for Type 2 Diabetes Patients on Ambulatory Visits and Hospitalizations.

Troels Kristensen, Kim Rose-Olsen, Christian Volmar Skovsgaard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging point-of-care technologies for bacterial pathogen detection.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Troels KristensenDaCHE, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløw vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-6895
Kim Rose-OlsenDaCHE, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløw vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Christian Volmar SkovsgaardDaCHE, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløw vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2064-9942
University of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care testing (POCT) of HbA1c means instant test results and more coherent counseling that is expected to improve diabetes management and affect ambulatory visits and hospitalizations. From late 2008, POCT has been implemented and adopted by a segment of the general practices in the capital region of Denmark. The aim of this study is to assess whether the introduction of POCT of HbA1c in general practice (GP) has affected patient outcomes for T2 diabetes patients in terms of hospital activity. We apply difference-in-differences models at the GP clinic level to assess the casual effects of POCT on the following hospital outcomes: (1) admissions for diabetes, (2) admissions for ambulatory care sensitive diabetes conditions (ACSCs), (3) ambulatory visits for diabetes. The use of POCT is remunerated by a fee, and registration of this fee is used to measure the GP's use of POCT. The control group includes clinics from the same region that did not use POCT. The sensitivity of our results is assessed by an event study approach and a range of robustness tests. The panel data set includes 553 GP clinics and approximately 30,000 diabetes patients from the capital region of Denmark, observed in the years 2004-2012. We find that voluntary adoption of POCT of HbA1c in GP has no effect on hospital admissions and diabetes-related hospital ambulatory visits. Event study analysis and different treatment definitions confirm the robustness of these results. If implementation of POCT of HbA1c improves other parts of diabetes management as indicated in the literature, it seems worthwhile to implement POCT of HbA1c in the capital region of Denmark. However, doubts around the quality of POCT of HbA1c testing and a desire to capture data at central labs may prevent implementation of more value based HbA1c testing.

Indexed as

General PracticeHospitalizationAmbulatory Care FacilitiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Family PracticeHumansPoint-of-Care TestingReferral and Consultationambulatory visitsdiabetesdifference-in-differences (DID) modelsevent study analysisgeneral practiceHbA1chospital admissionspatient datapoint-of-care testing (POCT)

Identifiers

PMID32858923
PMCPMC7504504
OpenAlexW3081426503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.