ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2020
Neither mad nor bad? The classification of antisocial personality disorder among formerly incarcerated adults.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Using the National Comorbidity Survey, this study explores the presence and symptoms of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) among people with varying degrees of contact with the criminal justice system. The study finds an elevated prevalence of ASPD among formerly incarcerated persons, but also that ASPD is not a simple linear function of actual or potential contact with the criminal justice system. For example, among people who have been arrested the prevalence of ASPD is not much greater than among those who committed a crime but were never arrested. Furthermore, the difference in prevalence between those who were incarcerated and those who were arrested but not incarcerated is small. Moreover, the prevalence is highly sensitive to the elimination of one particular symptom among seven: failure to conform to social norms, as indicated by having been arrested. Eliminating this single symptom reduces the prevalence of ASPD by more than 50%, even among formerly incarcerated persons. Additional analyses reveal that, among formerly incarcerated persons who meet the diagnostic threshold for ASPD, their set of symptoms is perhaps driven more by their circumstance than their personality. For example, while formerly incarcerated persons frequently report failing to fulfill their promises, fewer than one in ten report a lack of remorse for having mistreated others. These findings suggest the need to further contextualize ASPD symptomatology, particularly among populations with frequent contact with the criminal justice system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.