Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32858053›Full record

ArticleContraception2020

Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Kavita Shah Arora, Roselle Ponsaran, Laura Morello, Leila Katabi, Rosemary T Behmer Hansen, Nikki Zite, Kari White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uncertainty in Postpartum Permanent Contraception Decision-Making: Physician and Patient Perspectives.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
  8. Obstetrician-Gynecologist Perspectives and Counseling Practices on the U.S. Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kavita Shah AroraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States; Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: Kavita.Shah.Arora@gmail.com.
Roselle PonsaranDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Laura MorelloDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Leila KatabiDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Rosemary T Behmer HansenDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Nikki ZiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Kari WhiteSteve Hicks School of Social Work and Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Factors influencing vasectomy useK01HD079563 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WHITE, KARI L · 2015 to 2018
$522k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD079563NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the attitudes and beliefs of obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States (US) regarding the Medicaid postpartum sterilization policy. STUDY

designWe recruited obstetrician-gynecologists practicing in ten geographically diverse US states for a qualitative study using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists directory. We conducted semi-structured interviews via telephone, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method and principles of grounded theory.

resultsWe interviewed thirty obstetrician-gynecologists (63.3% women, 76.7% non-subspecialized, and 53.3% academic setting). Participants largely described the consent form as unnecessary, paternalistic, an administrative hassle, a barrier to desired patient care, and associated with worse health outcomes. Views on the waiting period's utility and impact were mixed. Many participants felt the sterilization policy was discriminatory. However, some participants noted the policy's importance in terms of the historical basis, used the form as a counseling tool to remind patients of the permanence of sterilization, felt the policy prompted them to counsel regarding sterilization, and protected patients in contemporary medical practice.

conclusionMany physicians shared concerns about the ethics and clinical impact of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Future revisions to the Medicaid sterilization policy must balance prevention of coercion with reduction in barriers to those desiring sterilization in order to maximize reproductive autonomy. IMPLICATIONS: Obstetrician-gynecologists are key stakeholders of the Medicaid sterilization policy. Obstetrician-gynecologists largely believe that revision to the Medicaid sterilization policy is warranted to balance reduction of external barriers to desired care with a process that enforces the need for counseling regarding contraception and reviewing patient preference for sterilization throughout pregnancy in order to minimize regret.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidPostpartum PeriodPregnancySterilizationSterilization, ReproductiveUnited StatesDisparitiesMedicaidObstetrician–gynecologistsPostpartum sterilizationReproductive justiceUnintended pregnanciesWomen’s health policy

Identifiers

PMID32858053
PMCPMC7606385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.