Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32857992›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2020

Immunogenicity of a single-dose compared with a two-dose primary series followed by a booster dose of ten-valent or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South African children: an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Shabir A Madhi, Eleonora Aml Mutsaerts, Alane Izu, Welekazi Boyce, Sutika Bhikha, Benit T Ikulinda, Lisa Jose, Anthonet Koen, Amit J Nana, Andrew Moultrie and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02943902 (An Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating for Non-inferiority of 1+1 Compared to 2+1 Dosing Schedules of 10-valent and 13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02943902 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating for Non-inferiority of 1+1 Compared to 2+1 Dosing Schedules of 10-valent and 13-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) in South African Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Witwatersrand, South AfricaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled600ConditionsPneumonia, MeningitisArmsPneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10 ) 1+1, 6 weeks, Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10 ) 1+1, 14 weeks, Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10 ) 2+1, Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13 ) 1+1, 6 weeks, Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13 ) 1+1, 14 weeks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Streptococcus pneumoniae and other bacterial nasopharyngeal colonization seven years post-introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South African children.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shabir A MadhiSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa. Electronic address: madhis@rmpru.co.za.
Eleonora Aml MutsaertsSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Alane IzuSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Welekazi BoyceSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sutika BhikhaSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Benit T IkulindaSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lisa JoseSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Anthonet KoenSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Amit J NanaSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Andrew MoultrieSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lucy RoalfeImmunobiology Section, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Adam HuntImmunobiology Section, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
David GoldblattImmunobiology Section, University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Clare L CutlandSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jeffrey R DorfmanSouth African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytical Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science, National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity College London · GBNational Research Foundation · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine childhood immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) has changed the epidemiology of pneumococcal disease across age groups, providing an opportunity to reconsider PCV dosing schedules. We aimed to evaluate the post-booster dose immunogenicity of ten-valent (PCV10) and 13-valent (PCV13) PCVs between infants randomly assigned to receive a single-dose compared with a two-dose primary series.

methodsWe did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised study in HIV-unexposed infants at a single centre in Soweto, South Africa. Infants were randomly assigned to receive one priming dose of PCV10 or PCV13 at ages 6 weeks (6w + 1 PCV10 and 6w + 1 PCV13 groups) or 14 weeks (14w + 1 PCV10 and 14w + 1 PCV13 groups) or two priming doses of PCV10 or PCV13, one each at ages 6 weeks and 14 weeks (2 + 1 PCV10 and 2 + 1 PCV13 groups); all participants then received a booster dose of PCV10 or PCV13 at 40 weeks of age. The primary endpoint was geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of serotype-specific IgG 1 month after the booster dose, which was assessed in all participants who received PCV10 or PCV13 as per the assigned randomisation group and for whom laboratory results were available at that timepoint. The 1 + 1 vaccine schedule was considered non-inferior to the 2 + 1 vaccine schedule if the lower bound of the 96% CI for the GMC ratio was greater than 0·5 for at least ten PCV13 serotypes and eight PCV10 serotypes. Safety was a secondary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02943902) and is ongoing.

findingsOf 1695 children assessed, 600 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the six groups between Jan 9 and Sept 20, 2017; 542 were included in the final analysis of the primary endpoint (86-93 per group). For both PCV13 and PCV10, a 1+1 dosing schedule (either beginning at 6 or 14 weeks) was non-inferior to a 2 + 1 schedule. For PCV13, the lower limit of the 96% CI for the ratio of GMCs between the 1 + 1 and 2 + 1 groups was higher than 0·5 for ten serotypes in the 6w+1 group (excluding 6B, 14, and 23F) and 11 serotypes in the 14w + 1 group (excluding 6B and 23F). For PCV10, the lower limit of the 96% CI for the ratio of GMCs was higher than 0·5 for all ten serotypes in the 6w+1 and 14w + 1 groups. 84 serious adverse events were reported in 72 (12%) of 600 participants. 15 occurred within 28 days of vaccination, but none were considered to be related to PCV injection. There were no cases of culture-confirmed invasive pneumococcal disease.

interpretationThe non-inferiority in post-booster immune responses following a single-dose compared with a two-dose primary series of PCV13 or PCV10 indicates the potential for reducing PCV dosing schedules from a 2 + 1 to 1 + 1 series in low-income and middle-income settings with well established PCV immunisation programmes.

fundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1 + 152352).

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleImmunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, BacterialFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfantMalePneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesSouth Africa10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine13-valent pneumococcal vaccineAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GPneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID32857992
PMCPMC7689288
OpenAlexW3081138330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.